The Wedding Business in Worse Shape than First Thought

By Paul Pannone

An ongoing eWedNewz investigation shows the wedding business is in worse shape than anyone is willing to admit. Information and interviews across all channels of the business, including the part reported to be the most important; the dress business, shows severe damage caused by the collapse of the economy in 2008 and a slow recovery through 2011 and most of 2012.

Like brides, dresses come in all colors, not just white. Tuxedos have been replaced by black suits, navy and tan colors and everything you can imagine.

eWedNewz watches trends that includes the longer wait of men and women deciding to get married. The average age for first-time marriages continues to rise.

“The median age for a man’s first marriage was 28.2 years in 2010, up from 26.1 in 1990. The median age for a woman’s first marriage was 26.1 years in 2010, up from 23.9 in 1990,” according to www.infoplease.com  sourcing  U.S. Bureau of the Census information.

According to Census information the combined average age of men and women since 1960 has increased nearly 21% and has continues to rise world-wide. World trends show an even greater increase to resisting marriage. In the UK the average age for men and women hit 30 years this year citing Pew research while exploring probable causes.

Shedding tradition and traditional values continues to affect the number of marriages but also the formality of those weddings that do take place. Stylish, non-traditional weddings express the thoughts of couples who no longer want to be told what to wear, how to feel or plan their day.

Trends and shifts from normal wedding business finds those who plan to stay in the business are forced to change their operations to adapt to the shrinking numbers. Khalilah Olokunola of A Boxed Event and member of the Wedding Water Cooler shared her thoughts in the controversial forum:

“Many vendors I know have tripled up-not fine tuning their business to meet the demands of the changed times but instead (add) a whole new business . IT seems acceptable in some circles to be the baker, designer, director,planner and videographer- and no I’m not making that up there is a business that offers that.

Gone seems the days where you have to have skill and experience before you could add a title to your name. If you truly want to be successful you have to work hard, hustle hard and accept constructive criticism from more seasoned veterans. Geez I do all the time , I’m a coolie.

With brides and other “socialistas” decreasing their average budgets we all find ourselves redeveloping our business plans and offerings but still maintaining our integrity by offering the better bang for your buck,” says Khalilah.

Khalilah and others say the wedding business is flooded with services and products, challenging the pricing ability for vendors who seem to increase faster in numbers than the market shrinks. Plainly put there is no more need or room for another DJ, gown manufacturer, limousine company or any of the products to create traditional weddings. There are even too many catering facilities who’ve been forced to service a broader spectrum of events to keep rooms, kitchens and workers busy.

While investigating the story about the wedding dress business we’ve uncovered a growing number of outside sources infiltrating the business forcing manufacturers to take action. Recent advancements in the fight against pirates who’ve crippled the wedding dress business received no credit from skeptics who say the damage is too deep, too wide-spread and can never return to normal levels.

Across all channels eWedNewz watches and reports the changes taking place at places like David’s Bridal down to the smallest bridal stores who say they’re ready to throw in the towel. Decisions to sell majority equity stakes to investors like the one involving Jim’s Formal Wear become more and more common-place. Store closures servicing the wedding business are expected to increase, as manufacturers and suppliers tell eWedNewz they can no longer manage growing debt because accounts can’t meet their obligations.

Newsstand sale of bridal magazines continues to plummet giving some ammunition to pundits who say digital is killing print. But a closer look by eWedNewz shows grandfather wedding websites like TheKnot.com are also taking a pounding. eWedNewz exposé  stories about scandal, sexual debauchery and reported mismanagement of resources culminated in the death of morph digital/print companies like Get Married. So-far the rebirth of the company failed to come close in recapturing the glory the original launch created before the crash in 2008, now that the wedding business is older and wiser about the fairy-dust that surrounds them.

Planners of all sizes, including celebrity, say they’re looking to exit the business or expand into a broader range of services, no longer able to cut costs or charge enough fees to make it worth their while. Even “Wedding Market Gurus”, A.K.A, snake oil salespeople, are finding it difficult, if not impossible to charge speaking fees they did just a few short years ago. Most avoid our questions and keep pounding their drum of bullshit, acting as though everything is fine, while others see the changes and become alarmist, claiming to have the answer in some seminar or class.

Even hopefuls who thought the addition of Same-sex marriages to the wedding market, backed by the leader of the free world, say the events has so-far been just a small blip on the screen.

Olokunola again gave her view on how some of the troubles could be fixed:

“When the people who govern wedding magazine, trade shows and associations get real maybe– just maybe– it’ll get better. It’ll make it harder for scammers to scam and players to play and when we stick together as a whole. I believe a shift will take place towards an up direction and its there that the industry can begin again,” she said in the WWC forum.

Christine Boulton of Think Like A Bride told the Cooler how some companies are successful in the very tough business climate.

“There has been some serious restructuring in our business over the last four years. Business owners have changed their thinking; they are going after new markets and they have stepped away from an attitude of arrogance. In short, they stopped thinking of themselves as “artist” and begun to see themselves as businesses.”

Endless discussions clearly show the end of the wedding business as it once was. Is it time to stop discussing and look at what the information clearly tells us?

 

In an ongoing poll 32% of respondents so-far say the wedding business is rebounding but slowly.

What do you say?

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

Martha Stewart Continues Print Scale Back

By Paul Pannone

eWedNewz watches the anticipated scale back since reporting the troubles at Martha Stewart  in the opening days of 2012. The company shed jobs in 2011 along with non-performing transactions including its stake in Wedding Wire, jumping out just in time.

This go-around eWedNewz has learned Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia is scaling back its print operation. The pinstripe princess of print’s company announced they were scaling back two of its four magazines resulting in over 60 employees losing their jobs.

 

Martha took up painting as a hobby during her guest stay, courtesy of the state. The troubles continue since her release, as print plummets because of digital.

According to sources near the story added layoffs are considered by the company currently employing almost 600 people. Analysts cite the company’s positioning that is dependent on only two titles: Martha Stewart Living and Martha Stewart Weddings.

eWedNewz  continues to watch Martha Stewart’s move away from print and towards digital, along with other print publications.

Over 40% of a current poll feels print will continue to decline, what do you say?

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

Wedding Wire Gets More Funding

By Paul Pannone

eWedNewz has learned the Catalyst Group’s Wedding Wire has secured $25 million dollars of funding from Spectrum Equity for a minority stake in the company. The five-year-old company originally raised $5.5 million from Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia. Four years later, Martha Stewart sold its stake to Catalyst Investors, more than doubling its money.

 

Spectrum Equity hands over 25$ million to Catalyst for a minority stake in Wedding Wire.

 

Sources near the story say the company is profitable enough to have pulled in the infusion of capital needed to grow the company further.

Members of the Wedding Water Cooler discussed the latest newZ. Some feel the Wedding Wire format is sorely lacking in some areas, especially in the review system that irritates most vendor/advertisers. According to sources in the WWC the company has managed to spin information in a palpable way, sidestepping the discord between vendors that receive bad reviews; unable to get them removed or corrected.

One source told the group of a possible alignment with another company that could change the entire structure of Wedding Wire. The information, derived from recent meetings and support from wedding industry sources, say there are more changes expected at Wedding Wire. eWedNewz continues to investigate the information.

In an ongoing poll 33% of readers voting call Wedding Wire “great” while 40% say the company is “flawed” or the “best we have” at the moment. 19% call Wedding Wire “horrible” while only 4% feel they’re trying to change.

 

 

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

Brides Magazine to Return to Bi-monthly

By Paul Pannone

eWedNewz has learned that Brides magazine plans to go back to a bi-monthly format, publishing its magazine six times a year instead of twelve. The move comes after nearly three years of continued decline, revenue loss  and much criticism from advertisers who took flight to competitors of the publication.

After almost three years of criticism and declining newsstand positioning, Brides gets back to 101 business.

 

Brides went monthly after its owner, Conde’ Nast, shut down several revered properties including Modern Bride in 2009 in trying to combine sagging sales brought about by the economic crash in 2008.

According to sources familiar with the story the return to bi-monthly is imminent and comes after what they feel is another failed attempt to bolster sales and interest in the publication.

Critics feel luring lost advertisers back won’t be easy. A timeline shows Condé Nast purchased Elegant Bride and closed it because they couldn’t sell enough ads or newsstand copies.  Condé Nast bought Modern Bride for and closed it because of declining ad and newsstand revenue.  They switched to monthly publishing — but lost ads and allowed newsstand sales to dip to 60K in some issues.

Brides unceremoniously got rid of Millie Bratten, credited as one of the most respected and experienced editors in the business, replacing her with an editor who believes that Brides shouldn’t openly promote a Fall Fashion issue. Condé Nast fired an experienced sales staff and replaced it with people who had no bridal experience.

Condé Nast invested millions in a redesign that has so far not stopped the slide. In the redesign Conde’ Nast increased the magazine’s dimensions and upgraded the paper stock, changed their logo,  studied more than 400 different type styles before making a decision but so-far has not made a difference.

Despite the efforts newsstand sales lag behind Martha Stewart Weddings, The Knot, Bridal Guide and For the Bride;  Brides is the number 5  book in the field — in terms of newsstand sales.

An ongoing poll shows 56% of responding eWedNewz readers feel the magazine has fallen too far to survive.

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

Samantha Slaps Sonny; Mentions Martha and Calls out Catalyst

By Paul Pannone

In yet another War & Peace type statement, Samantha Goldberg continued her relentless rant against Wedding Wire and their practices this week that have come under fire by the wedding industry. In an ongoing eWedNewz poll 44% of respondents so far feel the review website is horrible or flawed; 34% say Wedding Wire is great. But only 2% say they’re trying to improve.

 

Would Wedding Wire list and rate itself? If they did, what would their score be?

 

In a protracted response to Wedding Wire’s decision of  expunging a solid business in Oklahoma, Goldberg mercilessly recaps months of information involving the website, the name synonymous with the website and now, the new owners. In the prepared statement Goldberg speaks directly to Sonny Ganguly throughout her writing but calls out the new owners, the Catalyst Group, wondering if they are aware of what’s happening.

“Sonny, I know you must be reading this…Catalyst, they may not have, and I am sure they will question the many unethical things you have caused. Why they bought the 40% of Martha’s shares, I’ve no idea) There’s a great reason why Martha did. She is an amazing woman and certainly was a BIG percentage of why people stayed longer than they should. That despite her business decisions, she is right back up there being successful and changing as she needs to… She’s an “icon” of our world…and more. http://www.examiner.com/article/martha-stewart-sells-wedding-wire-for-5-million-dollars.”

Goldberg’s latest statement was released to the Wedding Water Cooler group. Members of the group recently stopped following the discussion, turning off alert emails. Others requested a more clear, concise type of response from Goldberg– but none will say her campaign is completely unwarranted.

In WWC discussions, David Fuhrer, suggested Wedding Wire add itself as a vendor to their listing service;

“Why doesn’t Wedding Wire list itself under the “Wedding Planning” category upon its website? It could then be reviewed in a likewise manner as its listing-population-base (I don’t refer to them as clients…we don’t know who paid, who paid more, who didn’t pay, who paid less, etc).

Heck they could start today & upload a WW listing in this category, and they could be be tested for how legit & “hands off they are” ’cause Samantha would be among the first reviewers. WW could perhaps learn some stuff from the listing-population-base that would better WW & the industries online efforts overall. Who loses w/ this suggestion? Win-win, no?” according to Fuhrer.

Other members of the group called Führer’s suggestion brilliant and see no reason Wedding Wires shouldn’t be listed and subjected to the same scrutiny they’ve created for other wedding industry organizations.

A copy of Samantha Goldberg’s statement was sent to Ganguly/Wedding Wire/Catalyst for comment. No response came by the time of this story’s release.

Download a copy of Goldberg’s release in its entirety.

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012