The Wedding Business Rocked by Market Facts and Truth

 

By Paul Pannone

In the closing days of 2012 the wedding business is buzzing because of newZ involving major companies who are bailing out of the business, bringing investors in to shoulder the financial burden and responsibility of trying to run a profitable business in the shrinking wedding market.

Yesterday’s story, The Wedding Business in Worse Shape than First Thoughtdrew reaction in all social media formats and plenty of private response from industry veterans who would like to dispute the newZ– but can’t.

 

 ”I’ll also bet that few if any of the existing US manufacturers close this year or next, the number will represent an insignificant percentage of the total. Is there anyone out there who will take the bet?” says Jim Duhe.

 

Jim Duhe gave his usual response in his own style saying;

 ”Your story isn’t a cheerful launch pad for the start of the new year. Certain aspects may or may not be accurate but I’m not alone in refusing to accept that the sky isn’t falling — at least not quite yet.  The average age of couples who wed has increased each decade since the turn of the 20th century.  When I joined the bridal industry in the 1970′s, we advised advertisers that “brides are older, better educated, and more affluent than ever before in history.”  It was a documented fact in the 1970′s.  It was equally true in the 1980′s.  It was true in the 1990′s.  It was true in the first decade of the 21st century.  It’s still true today.

However, age, education, and affluence don’t necessarily mean that a death knell is replacing wedding bells or that traditional weddings no longer represent a preferable life style choice for a meaningful number of Americans. Research conducted by Bridal Guide and all other publications as well as by prominent on line bridal sites like The Knot indicates that the number of destination weddings that take place in foreign countries is substantial.

Because foreign countries are not required to report the number of US citizens who marry to the Departments of Health, Education, and Welfare, it’s difficult/virtually impossible to determine the exact number of Americans who marry annually.   Therefore, it’s difficult/virtually impossible to verify that the total number of American weddings has declined substantially in recent years.  Regardless, many people who select to have a destination wedding continue to purchase bridal apparel in this country. They still create wedding gift registries in this country.

Long range business success requires much more than keeping up with trends. It’s essential to run one step (or more) ahead of them.  Conceptually, the challenges to bridal retailers created by online bridal apparel sales in 2013 aren’t  dramatically different from those offered by direct mail purchases (JC Penney, Sears, et.al.) in the 1980′s.  However, direct mail bridal apparel had an Achilles heel that online retailers don’t have: return policies.  The vast majority of online sales are generated by companies that are headquartered in foreign countries.  These companies can’t be forced to comply with US laws regarding merchandise returns.

Because the majority of China/direct sites offer positive consumer reviews (that may or may not be complete fabrications) consumers are lulled into a sense of security in their buying decision.  Unfortunately, prominent “money back guarantees” offered by China/direct companies generally are unenforceable.  There’s little if anything that a consumer can do to secure a refund for merchandise that is unacceptable or substandard.   Unlike complaints posted on Google, Wedding Wire, and others sites, there is no place for a consumer to publicize a complaint about a China/direct web site purchase.  It’s a perfect storm for China/direct sites:  on site comments are consistently positive; there’s no way for anyone to complain publicly.

Frankly, I don’t have answers to many of the questions that plague independent bridal retailers or tuxedo rental specialists.  However, that doesn’t mean that answers don’t exist.  It may well be that the number of existing independent bridal apparel stores will suffer from attrition. That’s a distinct possibility.  However,  I’ll bet you that new bridal retailers will launch in 2013, 2014, 2015, and beyond.

Seasoned bridal industry experts predicted that there were far too many bridal manufacturers — that there would be a “fall out” in the 1970′s — in the 1980′s — in the 1990′s — in 2000.  These predictions continue today. I’ll bet that there will be more bridal brand names in 2013 than there were in 2012.  There probably will be even more in 2014.   I’ll also bet that few if any of the existing US manufacturers close this year or next, the number will represent an insignificant percentage of the total. Is there anyone out there who will take the bet?”, said Duhe.

Duhe’s statement started strong but seemed to fall asleep by its end. So did that of Christine Boulton, who called to discuss the story. Boulton proposed there are clients who are doing well in the wedding business. We never suggested there weren’t. But Boulton could not argue there are fewer wedding industry professionals doing well than there are doing terrible. In fact none of the discussions could challenge any of the central points of the story. Simply put, the increasing challenges against a shrinking (traditional) market will not lead to a happy ending.

The story dates back to 2009 when companies like David’s Bridal sought positive data, wanting to know when the wedding industry would recover. No such information existed but through hocus-pocus hypotheses (guessing) there would be a spring-back in the wedding business. To date it doesn’t seem likely.

An ongoing eWedNewz investigation concludes the data failed to include variables, including the languishing economy that will continue to plague a full recovery in spending for traditional wedding goods and services. The results, exacerbated by growing competition in all areas of the wedding business, dilutes the ability to command higher prices from consumers. The decline of over four years with no end in sight resulted in decisions by major wedding companies, including owners of David’s Bridal, Leonard Green and Associates, to divest themselves from a majority stake in the wedding business.

The statement is supported by an overnight shift since the story released. An ongoing poll feels the wedding business is deteriorating (29%), stuck in neutral (15%) or is yet to reach the bottom (13%).

What do you say?

 

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

eWedNewz Helps Shine the Light on Posting During Tragedy

By Paul Pannone

An ongoing story about normal posting during catastrophe and times of tragedy continues to rock the wedding business, especially those who were exposed for normal tweets and Facebook posts during last week’s horrible event in Connecticut. Private discussions over the weekend with some wonderful people and some not-so-wonderful idiots shows the good and bad in the world. Today we focus on the positive.

Do you agree there is a time and place for everything?

Alicia LeGala at Fantasia Bridal, Long Island, New York, told eWedNewz how shaken she was while trying to run her business and posting what she thought was a routine image.

“I had no idea what was happening at that moment. My daughter called to tell me there was some guy on the internet making the store look bad,” she told eWedNewz.

Alicia’s store was one of several highlighted for posting usual images and thoughts on the tragic day, while the events were unfolding. A discussion with Alicia informs eWedNewz that she was mortified and wanted to be clear she is not the insensitive person the internet exchange made her out to be.

“I really felt horrible and wished I knew what was going on. I never would have posted anything because I didn’t feel like doing any sort of business, once I learned what happened. I was shaken because of the senseless death of those poor, innocent victims,” says LeGala.

The Brooklyn-born native told eWedNewz  she learned that everyone needs to be more aware, cognizant and responsible for what they post, especially during national tragedy.

An ongoing poll that originally gave the benefit of the doubt to companies like Alfred Angelo became less tolerant after the murders in Connecticut. Currently 37% (and rising) say there is a time and place for everything, denouncing normal posting during tragedy. 28%  (and declining) say it’s perfectly fine. 17% say they don’t like it but it is the right of the company to do as they wish. 12% voted “other” and include excuses regarding  preset, automated posts.

In our discussion LeGala agrees the automated posts are still the responsibility of the company. In other discussions business experts told eWedNewz the bigger companies who pay people to keep their Social Media active have an even greater responsibility; to make certain the company’s image and community standing is upheld.

Christine Boulton of Think Like a Bride told eWedNewz, “I wasn’t totally convinced during the Sandy incident with Alfred Angelo. But with this horrible event, I agree with what you’re saying.”

Boulton posted her thoughts on Facebook, as people gave their heartfelt prayers and thoughts to the victims and their families. Boulton and others found the trite posts distracting, awkward and out-of-place from the moment, giving the impression of insensitivity and a disconnect with the horrible event.

In contrast companies like Macy’s took time out to offer their condolences along with small businesses who said they would not be offering any discounts, even foregoing any sort of normal business activity.

In this ongoing eWedNewz story we welcome the thoughts of everyone, including those who disagree. In addition we await with open arms the scurrilous threats against us who are scared of being exposed as the insensitive idiots they are. We’ve warned them to stay off our radar and crawl back under the rock the came from. At this time in history there is zero tolerance or time for their stupidity.

What do you think?

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

Wedding Water Cooler Members Struggle to stay on Wedding Topics

By Paul Pannone

Because of the recent events in the country over the past several weeks wedding-related topics seemed to have taken a back seat to higher issues plaguing society. The hurricane disaster, the election and aftermath that has further divided the country has taken the attention away from trivial problems of the wedding business and caused many wedding industry people to get more involved in charitable activities and others to use the disaster as a reason to tailor marketing and try to scam dollars in any way they can.

 

New additions to the Wedding water Cooler includes retailers who’ve moved past their front door and been involved with all sides of the business.

Wedding Water Cooler members have tried to get back on topic sans the normal rhetoric and internal bashing. The addition of several new members could be a reason for the better behavior– but I doubt it. Members of the group did not escape devastation, citing down trees and power outages in their homes and businesses. Some opined on how this hurricane and devastation differed from Irene, hitting the metro New York and New Jersey area, getting more coverage.

Industry veteran and co-founder of the WWC, Christine Boulton, wrote a story involving wedding planners and the different roles they play. The story struck a nerve in the group and steered discussions back on track to the more trivial part of life– the wedding business.

Boulton’s story sketches out the roles played by planners in the following structure:

The Architect:

The architect designs everything from the structure to the appliance placement to the general layout of the landscaping. To translate this to wedding planning you start with nothing and design the whole package from location to lighting concept to the style of the invitations.

The General Contractor: 

The GC takes the plans and makes them happen. She hires the subs and creates the schedule. She keeps everything on track and budget. The translation: you take the brides concept and find the right vendors to make it happen. You make sure that they are all on the same page and working on schedule, that the flowers are delivered at the right moment and that the cake gets cut when the photographer is in place to catch the shot. You are the field general, implementing someone else’s plan.

The Stage Manager:

The stage manager comes in last, after the walls are in and the floors are in place. He makes sure that at the time of performance  timing is adhered to, that the props are all in place and that everyone hits their marks. This translates to weddings as someone who comes in after all the vendors have been hired and the major decisions made. You manage the actual day of, you work with what they are given to make the brides vision happen.

Boulton’s piece was hailed by planner members including  Khalilah Olokunola who said:

“Best damn article I’ve read in a long time regarding the roles of planning – I plan on sharing the heezy jeezy out of this! If more planners understood the different roles we would have less drama a better interpretation of what the industry and individuals have to offer. I’ve pondered throwing in the towel a few times this year, most recently last week because frankly it stinks and I’m so tired of the fly by night pop ups who do this just because they feel like it and not from because its fueled from a passion that started inside to create . I’m damn sure positive that I’m different , I look different, talk different and design different…heck I have different ideas of what fabulous is and isn’t - We all do ….The problem in it all is that you can’t market people who don’t really know who they are – I hope this article sets them free ….”

New addition to the group, Jacqui Wadsworth added:

“In our area, I’ve watched several women in the wedding business “become” wedding planners.  Their chosen fields weren’t apparently producing enough income, so they decided since they were photographers, or small bridal show event people, that they should “add-on” a related field in the form of wedding planner.  I’m keeping my eye open to see how this pans out for them.  I’m afraid that trend may be getting larger as everyone who loves the bridal market that can’t seem to make ends meet, looks for another way to do so.  I’ll keep you posted on my findings.
Meanwhile, I’m glad to hear what true wedding planners are doing.  Thanks!”
Wadsworth told eWedNewz she feels comfortable in the WWC since joining the group this month. So far Wadsworth has been the most-vocal of the new additions, taking her experience in retail, wholesale and combining the best of both worlds to start needed changes in the industry..
eWedNewz
All Rights Reserved
2012

The President’s View on Same-sex Marriage Comes Out; what do Wedding Water Cooler members say?

By Paul Pannone

Facing a new low in approval rating earlier this year president Obama took a shot at jump starting his popularity, especially among liberal voters and supporters of same-sex marriages. Members of the Wedding Water Cooler were asked for their thoughts.

 

With political pressure mounting president Obama announces his opinion of same-sex marriages.

 

June Hoffman, an Indiana Officiant asked Weeding Water Cooler members for their thoughts:

“Hi Coolies~

I could hardly believe the radio today when they reported President Obama’s new stance on same – sex marriage. I had to read it myself. Legalizing marriage for same-sex couples could potentially have a huge impact on the wedding-world economy. As Officiants/DJs/MCs, we’ve performed commitment ceremonies and receptions in the past. I know that there would be a huge spike in weddings if this becomes legal. Same-sex couples have the same challenges and dreams as other couples. Times are changing indeed.

President Obama is the first president to endorse this type stand. It would sure do wonders for the bridal gown and tuxedo businesses as well as all other facets of the wedding community [?].”

Certain members of the Wedding Water Cooler– one’s with brains that work– gave their thoughts on the subject that varied from opposition to thanking God for the president’s action. Strong arguments on all fronts presented in a professional way gave similar conclusions favoring personal belief and individuality that resists government intervention.

Peter Gould told Coolies, “Personally I think the government should get out of sanctioning a religious ritual such a marriage, and abide by separation of church and state. I realize that for legal reasons, and there are many we need to recognize some sort of domestic unions and partnerships for all gay or straight, and those that want to have a marriage do so separately in their religion.”

Liz St. John lightened some of the heavy thoughts with some levity pointing out;

” Just an observation here – (though I believe that ANYONE that would like to be married, should be able to make that mistake).

We now have one candidate for president the believes that two people should be able to marry regardless of sex and one candidate that believes that one man should be able to marry multiple women.. Very interesting time to be alive.”

But back to business, Jim Duhe told the group;

“While I personally always have supported same sex marriage, I think that we’re still a long way from having no resistance on this topic.  Look at what just happened in North Carolina.  The battle is far from won.  Obama isn’t a shoe-in for the next election. None of that means that I’m not optimistic.  I want same sex marriages to be a reality because they are the right thing to do.  I hope that they have a positive impact on our industry but I won’t count the money until I see the cash in my hand.  I’m not sure how I’d react if I were personally impacted by this ruling.  I don’t believe that I’d jump up and marry tomorrow but that’s a hypothesis.  I’m not sure what I’d do. “

On the more opininated side Samantha Goldberg who is also from Chicago, told WWC members;

“Not an Obama fan….

1.How he walked into office with accepting the Nobel prize..

2. He is not as sincere as one thinks..I am a Chicago native and that is where he lived for a long time.

3. He thinks he was responsible for Osama? LMAO…I have swampland too..

No comment… Sorry if that sounds cold- He could careless about gay etc.. He is trying to regain what he had when he accepted the role as “President” he lost many believers..that is fact…He’s lost the trust …so what does someone of this caliber due when they begin to lose this? They go for areas that the public fights for…to save his ass…” said Goldberg. So much for “no comment”.

Analyst and creator of the Wedding Water Cooler, Christine Boulton had this to say;

“ I think that the right to marry should be a universal right but it must be fought on a state by state basis. Woe be to the politician that puts forth the reported constitutional amendment to define marriage as “between a man and a woman” that it is rumored certain conservative Senators and Representatives are proposing. They risk their reputation with all but the very conservative fundamentalist religious types. (btw, it isn’t just Christians, it is the fundamentalist side of ALL religions)

One thing that President Obama said that was I think the most salient thing he has ever said, it was his children that helped to shape his new view. When in the course of conversation with his daughters it became evident that they saw no difference in the parents of their peers that were same sex couples, if fact, didn’t find it odd in the least, that he changed his view.

That my friends is what will make the change. How we raise or children. If we raise the next generation to be open and accepting, gay marriage will become open and accepted. If on the other hand, we raise them to be bigots, then we will see more repression. Just the opinion of one person.”

Jacqueline Johnson commented;

“I guess I am the only one left to comment on this very important matter.  I applaud the President for having a new revelation on life and addressing the fact that if a couple desires to pledge their everlasting love and loyalty to each other – they should have the right to do so.  Whether it is to get votes or not (no one can tell what is in the heart of anyone) he changed his mind from 3 years ago and now trying to correct a wrong.

I make it a rule not to comment on religion on politics outside of the home - as you always manage to offend someone.  However, the President did inherit a country in serious financial trouble, and while some of his actions I do not agree with, he has done the best job he knows how to: to steer a massive ship fraught with some of the most mean-spirited people you can find in this century.  From a woman’s right to healthcare: you have old, narrow-minded men dictating how we should all live and care for our bodies.

And yes, whether we like it or not, he did give the okay to have Osama Bin Laden taken out.  If the mission had failed, he would be blamed mercilessly for putting the lives of Americans at risk – and how naïve he was to undertake such a mission.  It happened under his watch – so he either gets the blame or the credit.

As one who knows the sting of racism first hand, I believe in live and let live. Gay, lesbian, heterosexual, we should all live our lives in a dignified manner.”

Johnson wrote about the value of the growing GLBT market, challenging the narrow-minded thinkers of the wedding business to embrace, not shun them.

eWedNewz gives the last slot to Marcinho Savant who had this to say in part:

“Some people must be unaware that at certain times throughout history, same-gender unions were, in fact, blessed by clergy and clerics. Life did not begin with the narrow scope surrounding the years we may personally remember— or whatever we may have personally been trained to believe. How lucky one must be to believe that one’s opinion is absolute and correct— beyond questioning, investigation and unimpeachable. What a luxury it must be to be able to smugly discount the pains of other souls. Thank God SOMEONE questioned something or we’d still believe the world was FLAT.”

 What do you think? Do you agree with Obama’s decision to become  the first president to endorse same-sex marriages?

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

 

2011 Story about Wedding Wire gets a boost

By Paul Pannone

A December, 2011 story about Samantha Goldberg trashing Wedding Wire is trending, boosted by an event in New Jersey last week with the United Way. New eWedNewz followers sent the story back up the charts, as more disgruntled vendors say they’re not happy with how Wedding Wire manages its reviews. The ongoing story sent readers back in the archives, getting some up to speed.

Round two for Wedding Wire, as Samantha Goldberg takes up her fight again.

 

In a statement responding to the coverage, Samantha Goldberg wrote:

“Finally I can now share hundreds of unhappy customers…It’s not opinion, I am not a bitch I am only protecting my friends and those who may not be my friends but don’t deserve this…”

Goldberg told eWedNewz she’s taken up the fight again after being forced to regroup and for personal health reasons. Since the Goldberg trash, Martha Stewart sold their interest in Wedding Wire to a company called Catalyst. Through the winter both sides went to their neutral corners but with last week’s event, the bell may again sounded.

Some objection from less-than open-minded members of the Wedding Water Cooler expressed their concern for dredging up the past. The comments led to some name-calling and usual childish antics in a place that has no rules. The exchange prompted respected wedding analyst, Christine Boulton, founder of the group, to say the following:

“The reason something from the past would suddenly trend has to do with the way his site is set up. eWedNewz runs a plug in called Related posts. At the end of each post the plugin post a list of 4 post that in some way relate to the days post. An algorithm controls it. Now, having said that, just because a post shows up in the “related post” section is not enough to make it trend. What makes it trend is people clicking on it. Consequently, this old post trended because it is still of interest.”

Despite the objections the Wedding Wire story is again exploding. eWedNewz is there to cover the facts.

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

Little Guys Pissed Over Big-Box Growth and Promotion

 

By Paul Pannone

An ongoing story involving the takeover of America splinters off into many paths, as confused Citizens of the United States– some of which are good people in business, not good business people– cry foul over many aspects of reality.   Average consumers and businesses feel they’re being squeezed out in favor of Big-box stores;  incensed by suppliers that run to them. The facts are sad, but they’re true.

According to About.com small business — firms with fewer than 500 employees — drives the U.S. economy by providing jobs for over half of the nation’s private workforce. According to a quote in their story;

“Small business drives the American economy,” said Dr. Chad Moutray, Chief Economist for the Office of Advocacy in a press release. “Main Street provides the jobs and spurs our economic growth. American entrepreneurs are creative and productive, and these numbers prove it.”

All true; small business owners are creative, tenacious, innovative, even cunning. But the reality is, most do not have the basic 101 skills to run successful businesses. You can re-read this statement as many times as you like; it won’t change the facts.

eWedNewz investigates why this is so and finds most business owners are driven by emotion, love for the product and see their business as an enemy to their lives, not a part of their life. Through the economic downturn that started in 2008, many have closed their business, replaced by people who lost their job and now see how difficult it is to be a business owner.

eWedNewz coverage of the China issues shows the disconnect of what Americans say and what they really do. A current poll shows only 16% of respondents so far say it doesn’t matter– or they don’t care– where products are produced, leaving 84% saying they do care and would support American products if they were competitively priced. If the poll was 100% reversed it would still show Americans feel the effect of offshore production and the slow but steady loss of American clout and prestige that affects us all. Yet Americans continue to buy products made elsewhere, spending less for the items but many are finding they’ve sacrificed a greater percentage of value, while putting American companies– and workers– out of business.

What you’ve so-far read is background to the real point of this story. In both their personal and business life, most Americans say one thing and do another. For this story we’ll focus on business decisions that should be universally standard across all channels but are not. With the affordability and ubiquitous availability of software, digital, social media, etc., most businesses stay stuck in neutral, letting competitors– especially Big-box operators– take market-share away from them, leading to eroded profit and exhausted patience.

Public exchange of some of the frustration is shown from eWedNewz stories that feature a divide between manufacturers and retailers that should be partnering together, instead of fighting each other. eWedNewz watches all sectors of business politely listening to laments and excuses of why small stores cannot compete. The conclusion; save for true market leading independent stores, the stay local campaign will face major challenges in the near future.

In the flower business websites like flowercomplaint.com urges the use of local shops. But support for convenience, brand recognition and decades of service, consumers still use the FTD network. If you watch and read what the complaint says, which way would you go? Do the names Home Depot and Wal-Mart mean anything? The very existence of Big-box stores named is contradictory to the high demand for service and quality American consumers ask for– but really comes down to the price they’re willing to pay.

In the dress business David’s Bridal is everyone’s enemy; anyone that makes or sells wedding dresses. Chat rooms and message boards are filled with horror stories– but so are complaints against little stores. Check the court docket; they’re filled with consumer cases– big and small.

According to sources the nation and the world are undergoing enormous change. But the desire for respect, value, expectation for and excellent experience never changes. However, human nature goes against the grain of business; big business. In the new order manufacturer say they’re tired of the overhead of dealing with smaller stores and look for one thing: the order.

Sources say Big-box stores can order goods fast and sell them even them faster. In a numbers game (that’s all it is) Big-box stores and manufacturers that can produce large sums of product somehow find each other. Big orders requires huge, up-front commitments on the part of the manufacturer. But as big business goes, from the moment they complete a deal they’re looking for someone cheaper, faster and able to deliver a better product; they only stick with each other because they cannot be replaced.

Several recent eWedNewz stories involving piracy and the success of larger operations struck a nerve, generating mostly private response. We’ll share one case for each story.

Christina DiBlase, owner of A. Bridal Co. & formal in New Jersey gave her opinion of what can be done to help the problems involving Chinese piracy. In response to the story, Jim Duhe responded:

“If manufacturers deleted all design images from their web sites and discontinued all advertising, their fate would be entirely in the hands of independent bridal retailers.  Unfortunately, most retailers aren’t nearly sophisticated enough to compete with big box stores or the brand name recognition of J.Crew, BHLDN, Nicole Miller, Bebe, and an ever growing number of national entities that are gaining prominence in the bridal marketplace.  The solution to Chinese  knock-offs may not be insurmountable but it certainly isn’t as simple as Christine DiBlase suspects.”

In repsonse to the comment, DiBlase fired back;

“Well, well I saw the article today and I guess good ol’ Jim Duhe thinks I’m a simpleton. I don’t see him offering a better solution. Wonder how’d he fix it. Apparently, we retailers are all so unsophisticated when it comes to advertising and branding that God only knows how we have survived so long in this economy. Our methods would most certainly be the demise of all those vendor who know so much more than us.”

Duhe’s turn:

“If retailers had a clue about marketing, they wouldn’t have paved the way for big box stores to walk off with more than 1/3 of all bridal gown sales in the country.  If bridal retailers had even a little marketing savvy, they would have developed multi-media ad campaigns that promote the benefits of shopping at an independent bridal salon.  Instead, the vast majority select not to advertise.  Brilliant.   I’m not saying that all bridal retailers are unsophisticated fools.  In fact, there are some brilliant retailers in the business.  However, as a group, they lack leadership and direction to address any problem that is industry-wide.  There has never been a successful national organization of  bridal retailers in America — EVER.

When big box stores began opening stores throughout the country, bridal retailers selected to move across town rather than maintain a location next to this new competitor.  The net result . . . most of the stores who moved away to escape the taint of David’s went out of business. Those who were “stuck” with locations near big box stores prospered.  Gee.  I wonder why?

When big box retailers began advertising in print, independent retailers decided that they wouldn’t advertise in any magazines that accepted big box store ads.  The net result . . . big box stores grew more quickly business of advertising exclusivity.  Brilliant move.

When the internet began to gain prominence, bridal retailers thought that their marketing problems were solved.  They believed that email blasts were the answer.  They believed that The Knot was the answer.  They believed that Wedding Wire was the answer.  The vast majority are willing to latch on to anything except logic to solve their problems.

Expecting the manufacturers to leave marketing is unrealistic and naive at best.  Don’t take my word for it.  Ask any manufacturer of any product with national distribution if this seems like a rational suggestion.  Do you think that Flow would select not to promote or advertise products on a web site?”

Duhe and other members of the Wedding Water Cooler mention FLOW and has consistently commented and applauded the formal wear manufacturer’s decision to break out of a mold (moldy) format that has not worked for decades. Onlookers that don’t understand basic business 101 passed on new programs and marketing ideas and found themselves  out of luck.

Not everyone sees it that way.

“Yes, by all means lets continue to send men to MW Tux…the store that treats the customer like cattle and charges them highway robbery prices to do it. There are however some brides who are wising up and seeking alternatives. Small local stores and chains can offer better prices, service and selection.

The new styles are falling short to deliver on all this grandiose marketing is claiming. I rented a Tony Bowls to a young man for prom this past week. I charged him the going rate “based” off all the hype and the slim fitted look. Just as MW tux would do for the Vera Wang items. The tux did not deliver one bit on its look and hype…it was so bad that the mother paid $75 more to have an old After Six La Strada shipped in! (only reason I did not give her a refund or cover the cost is the fact I advised her against renting the Tony Bowls.)

Marketing is good for any industry, but keep in mind it must be kept as honest as possible…fitted or slim fit rentals are a pipe dream. That is why they are rentals, if you want fitted try and convince your customer to buy the tuxedo and have it tailored as needed. Don’t over promise then under-deliver,” according to Stephen D. Schaffer, proprietor.

 

The owner of  tux2u.com charged $75 more to have an old After Six La Strada shipped in; another verification why tuxedo stores are losing credibility, renting old garments made over a decade ago. Please visit www.tux2u.com they have a good choice of cigars; and their watches aren’t bad either.

We won’t waste your time with more of Mr. Schaffer’s assertions; laughably about censorship. If you’re interested, you can see it here.

“That’s what’s wrong with a lot of the smaller operators that don’t get the bigger picture. They’re too stuck in running their store to update websites, get into Social Media and do all the things their competitors are doing right. Then they sit and cry about how bad business is,” says Christine Boulton, business adviser and creator of the Wedding Water Cooler.

 

What do you say? We promise not to censor you.

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

Christine Boulton; Wedding Marketer or Nostradamus?

By Paul Pannone

It’s rare you find a brain that works at all, much less as brilliantly as some of the Wedding Water Cooler members; especially its founder, Christine Boulton. Most women don’t care for Boulton’s brashness and that she makes sense when she speaks– and guys are mostly intimidated by her perception and ability to call it like it is. But Boulton does what she does without compunction. She rarely looks back and never takes any credit for her work. That’s why we’re taking a look.

eWedNewz watches Boulton as she moved away from a subscription-based format in 2010 to sharing her knowledge in open forums.

“What I do is give facts to my clients and along the way build websites; social media platforms and get everything to work in concert; to maximize results and create an often forgotten little thing called profit,” she tells eWedNewz.

Over the weekend– she works many of them– Boulton re-released a story she’d written in 2009 while we were in the depths of the worst economic crash since The Great Depression of the 1930′s. In her post she wrote;

“I was looking at my stats today and found an old article that was trending so I read it to see why. Well, I didn’t find the answer to that question but I did find something else interesting.

If you are a new follower then you may not know that in the beginning Think was a subscription only website. There are a few gems that never made it to the free side, this is one of them. Originally published in March 2009 in the early days of the Great Recession, I can’t believe how prophetic it was. The lessons in it are still important.”

But just how important, Boulton leaves to other to decide. Like other true wedding experts, Boulton is often asked her for her opinions on many topics involving the wedding business and how to market to the bride. But unlike other so-called experts (See Chris Jaeger), Boulton comes up with her own, creative ideas and doesn’t copy-cat others or poach their work.

 

Christine Nostradamus Boulton called the shakeout in the wedding business back in 2009.

In the Water Cooler Boulton maintains a higher level of standards and often runs from rants that lead to nowhere. On several occasions she’s had to step in and give her views to help put the train back on the tracks after a derailment.

“That’s difficult to do because the only rule we have is, there are no rules. But that being the case, I too can interject my own opinions and they’re usually taken very seriously and in the spirit it’s given,” says Boulton.

Recent books written by Ms. Nostradamus called on her talents as a successful wedding vendor; she was a cake maker. Boulton connects to her audiences as one of them, simply because she is a vendor at heart. In her first book, Bridal Show Success, Boulton gives the one-on-one experience of Bridal Shows high marks but noticed how many exhibitors weren’t taking full advantage of the opportunity; so she wrote a book about it.

Most recently she wrote a book called Brilliant Wedding Marketing. Boulton reports the books, separately and as a set, are selling well.

Boulton correctly predicted the events we’re seeing today back in 2009 and has often referred back to her stories in conversations and interviews with eWedNewz. This one caught our attention:

“What’s Dangerous Is Not To Evolve”

That is a recent quote from Jeff Bezos, CEO of Amazon.

People are always picking my brain about the wedding industry; how to grow their business, what steps to take, how to survive right now. That kind of thing. I think what Bezos said is the key for every small business, particularly in our industry.

You look around at the changes that are taking place right now. Look at this month’s Facts and Stats column. For the first time in recent memory the overall value of the wedding market is in decline and it looks like it will not fully recover until 2012. If you sit around on your hands and try and wait it out, hoping things will go back to the way they were you are in for a rude awakening. What are you doing to evolve?

I come on here every month with thoughts and ideas on how to grow your business. Ways to fine tune and tweak. How many of them have you implemented? What is stopping you? I watch some of the people that have come to me for advice actually use it. I am watching their market value grow every day.

The ones that are winning aren’t taking one little idea and trying it once. They are taking the body of advice and using it to formulate their own transformation. They are changing what they do and how they do it on a fundamental level. They are doing it deliberately and fearlessly and they are succeeding. What are you doing?

Continue reading the rest of Christine’s article

 

For Christine Boulton and other wedding marketers that come up with their own great ideas, the sky is the limit. For the other 95%…. it may be time to move on to something else.

eWedNewz continues to watch Fairy Dust speaker/marketers and will have much more to say in the coming months.

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

Poll Says Americans Would Buy American– if it existed

By Paul Pannone

An ongoing eWedNewz poll strongly suggests Americans would buy American-made products if they could be produced here in the United States. So far 61% of respondents say they would buy American products if they existed.

Since the global collapse that began in 2008, slow recovery and languishing effects are changing the way Americans view purchasing merchandise and could ultimately lead to more products made in the United States by American workers. But time, tide and off-shore manufacturing waits for no one, as our so-called partners get better at producing goods and selling them to our customers.

 

Automation, globalization, better technology and consumer demand for cheaper prices all contributed to selling the American worker down the Yangtze River. Is it time for American manufacturing to come back?

 

Jim Duhe gave eWedNewz readers his view of what Made In American once meant and how the deck is stacked against ever producing products here in the United States again.

Made In America was an important label in the post WWII era.  It meant that products were made with pride and quality craftsmanship.  It meant that the goods that we produced were  among the best in the world.  That was then.  This is now.

When bridal apparel produced off shore began to be commonplace in the US, a veteran gown manufacturer asked if I knew the difference between goods produced domestically and the goods that were being imported (aside from price).  OK.  I’ll bite.  What’s the difference?  “The imports are substantially better” he said.  The quality and design has improved steadily each year since then.  It probably will continue to improve.

I’m not suggesting that new legislation isn’t important to level the playing field.  However, it will take much more than new laws to fix the perception of the price/quality imbalance that consumers express.  Companies who produce goods have to prove that “Made In America” means something other than expensive,” says Duhe.

The ongoing poll suggests Americans would at least give goods made here a chance if they existed. As Duhe suggests in his statement American goods are often seen as expensive when compared to offshore products. In the past bad quality from both American and offshore makers forced consumers to seek lower prices for the same garbage. But over the last five years American standards of production have improved but so has China’s. Because of economic pressure and less demand prices have fallen but the cost to produce in China has risen.

Christine Boulton told eWedNewz it’s a footrace to see who can make a better quality product for a competitive price. She cites the recent events involving the auto industry.

“Chrysler and Detroit are working on that. You see what has happened to the auto industry. For a time, Made in America was synonymous with Crap. Detroit and the American auto manufacturer are having to work very hard to change that perception, says Boulton.

 

What do you think? Take the poll.

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

The bigger Debate of Whether the Guys should Match the Girls

By Paul Pannone

The look and feel of weddings continues to evolve to match the taste of an updated consumer that no longer marches to the beat of tradition and protocol. The financial crash that happened in 2008 reset the wedding industry, after it rebounded after 2002. But like all things change is good most of the time, but not all.

After 9/11/2001 the outlook on life and what makes people happy permeated all aspects of living, especially how the United States– and the world– views marriage. Tradition, religion and all things that box people in by rules is under attack; the goal is freedom to do what we want, when and if we want it.

As far back as 2006 American Wedding Traditions wrote:

Every American wedding has subtle traditional elements, but there are no really strict guidelines that we follow when planning our big day. Over the last ten years, wedding etiquette has really relaxed and American wedding traditions have become a lot more liberal. This new liberal outlook has enabled couples to marry in a style that they are comfortable with, instead of the sometimes rigid standards that some used to associate with American wedding tradition.

Of course this information scares the life out of people and organizations that make a living at selling fairy dust marketing, speaking engagements and general falsehoods of how to double your wedding business when in reality, marriage– how we know it– is all but over.

“I disagree that marriage is over, it’s simply changed. And Change is good, if it truly is for the better. Some of the changes I’ve seen are magnificent and long overdue. In fact some of the changes shouldn’t have happened because things were wrong to begin with. What I am saying is if something is done right by a bride, a groom, a couple; and takes into account good sense and good taste, there should never be a problem,” according to Jim Duhe.

But even Duhe admits some of the changes are attempts to grasp at straws because business has been so bad over the past few years. Like-thinking members of the Wedding Water Cooler that agree with Duhe understand how important it is to provide relevant information, including building confidence in right of passage events and how to approach them. Sheryl Davies, Jacqueline Johnson, Christine Boulton, Paul Eilenberg,  Steve Lang and other members agree changes are good but they must be based on good data, better judgement, all guided by good taste.

At a recent meeting Jim Duhe told eWedNewz the wedding industry is at a crossroad.

“It starts at the cradle and carries forth through high school. By then the formative years are gone and young adults are set in their ways. The world doesn’t need redundant rules but does require some structure. It simply cannot be a free-for-all,” he told eWedNewz.

In his career Duhe has blasted editors that inflict their personal opinions where they don’t belong. According to Duhe information should come from an expert; a person that makes their living interacting with their product, thereby gaining knowledge in all aspects of its creation and how it performs in the marketplace.

“That to me is a true expert. In the old days we called them professionals,” he told eWedNewz.

Duhe’s aversion to  Self-Proclaimed Tuxedo Experts is particularly interesting. Although he is a women’s formal fashion expert his thoughts are quite clear when it comes to the men.

“If it’s a formal event and she is in a gown, he belongs in a tuxedo. End of story,” he continues to profess.

In a debate on the Internet yesterday Duhe weighed in a curious picture that proposes men’s formal wear accessories no longer need to match the lady’s gown color. According to views opposing the idea, adverse changes happening in weddings are the direct result of younger-age groups not getting the right information at an earlier stage in life.

 

A new decree from a Savvi member say’s it’s good to be different. What do you say?

“So, I am taking this picture has to do with proms? Well, this is my point; that’s where it all starts. If people are not told how to dress properly in their teens, what do you think is going to happen when it’s time to marry?” asks Duhe.

Another like-thinking member of the WWC, Paul Eilenberg, said the following:

“I’m guessing this was not a joke.  This is an absolute disgrace. Certain things just can’t be fixed. The first part that offends  to mind is the vest. Vests end at or just a hair below the waist, not at the crotch. Is this a 1975 was & wear suit from Robert Hall? It certainly has that less than tailored look. The shirt is abominable  as is the pre-knotted tie.  I am unqualified to comment on the dress, however it does look god awful.”

The debate on my personal Face Book page at first garnered wishy-washy statements, unsure of how to answer. Private messages asked if I somehow sanctioned the look. Throughout, I refrained from giving my personal thoughts and kept the creator of the look a secret.

Picking up on on the story were bloggers and other tuxedo people who gave their thoughts. Heather Sconza blogged about the debate and gave a good account of what is happening.

“I always get excited to see where Paul is going with these questions, and this one had me scratching my head at first. Paul showed us a picture of a light canary yellow bridesmaid dressed standing next to what would be a groomsmen outfit made of a grey tuxedo with a vest in a dated looking shade of green paired with a tie striped of what looked like a hunter green, mint green, olive green maybe. First reaction = “ewww”!,” writes Sconza.

Read the entire story to see what she finally thinks. Heather is the upcoming generation that we’ve written about in this story. It matters little what Savvi says or what I think.

 

Is Heather right? Is Jim Duhe wrong? Please comment and tell us about it.

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

Boulton’s Brilliant Wedding Marketing Book is a Blast

By Paul Pannone

 

For over two years we’ve told you about Christine Boulton from Think Like a Bride, quoting her in many eWedNewz stories about the wedding business. In that time we’ve seen Christine rise from a local market adviser to national notoriety, quoted by other established wedding professionals. But now Boulton’s new book, Brilliant Wedding Marketing, takes the guesswork out of what she says about certain subjects covering them in a clear, concise way that no fairy dust seminar can ever come near.

 

Wedding marketing is tough. Christine’s new book makes it simpler to understand.

Boulton’s book follows another controversial book, Bridal Show Success, that irritated show producers around the country by telling the truth about what works in booth design and follow-up campaigns that did not fit into their sanctioning.

Now, Boulton does it again by getting endorsements from other wedding marketing organizations including Perfect Wedding Guide.

“I bought Brilliant Wedding Marketing last week and read it in one sitting!  As a representative of “the wedding media” with my own print publication, wedding website, database marketing program and bridal shows, it’s refreshing to read a book written by someone who just “gets it.”  I’ve read a lot of things out there from so called “wedding marketing experts” but none of them have been in the trenches like Christine.  Let me tell you – from my position – nothing is more frustrating to see wedding vendors waste opportunities to make a sale because they can’t get their head out of the sand.   This book will open your eyes and show you how to make your wedding marketing WORK because it CAN.  No more telling yourself “marketing and advertising just doesn’t work for ME” – YOU have to make it work.  I LOVE how much time Christine spends on company websites – it really does start there and NO amount of ad dollars will work for you if it’s leading brides to a website that won’t peak bride’s interests.  This book is a MUST READ.  I’m going to recommend it to all of our advertisers.  You spend thousands and thousands of dollars on marketing your business, wouldn’t you spend $20 to make sure it works?”

Sale of the books together as a package has helped wedding professionals cut the learning curve on topics like Social Media and improving conversion of leads to sales. But Boulton focuses the most attention on creating and maintaining the most powerful tool she feels is the difference between success and SUCCESS.

“The best money spent is making sure any size company has a really great website. Brides today can look at a site and know when they’re not going to use a company. You have one shot to get their attention. Forget not having a website, you have no chance at all,” she told eWedNewz.

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012