Popular Brands compared to Unknown Names

By Paul Pannone

Growing pressure caused by challenging economic conditions force consumers who are trying to make ends meet to buy merchandise at lower prices. But when is a bargain not a bargain?

In an eWedNewz investigation experts warn about merchandise with little or no salable market. In the past consumers were less informed of materials and manufacturing methods. Today with the help of Social Media the word quickly spreads on products and services that do not meet the ever-growing demand of consumers.

“Basically, you want to buy only desirable merchandise. Some times merchandise shows up with closeout dealers because it wouldn’t sell in a store,” according to one expert.

Others agree saying as the notoriety of a brand name increases so does the standard of quality demands for fit, construction and overall performance expectations. But with the faltering economy the line of distinction between a world-class brand recognized by consumers and made-up, fictitious names can be easily mistaken by buyers who think they’re saving money when ordering merchandise.

Unknown brands use cheaper pricing to build their business while true brands leverage image and consumer demand to command higher pricing and higher margins for retailers, while delivering sustained quality assurance and value to consumers. It’s important to remember products bearing the name of a recognized brand known for quality in a variety of item translates into higher pricing power and ongoing ability to perform to everyone’s expectations.

According to Ask.Reference.com Brand is often the company name or logo referenced for a specific business. “Branding” is when their name, logo or company specific identifiers are strategically placed to better market their brand to the consuming public.

Vera Wang tops other more-established tuxedo names but remains behind tuxedos bearing higher world-class branded recognition.

 

In today’s difficult economy even recognized brand names are forced to become affordable to compete with the growing choices offered to consumers. Such was the reason Vera Wang expanded her base of consumers by collaborating with David’s Bridal, creating a more affordable product but becoming the most expensive line at David’s. Strategically the Wang line became mainstream while lifting David’s pricing ability to a wider consumer base.

The Vera Wang organization followed-up by expanding into the men’s tuxedo business, collaborating with Men’s Wearhouse, creating style and demand in a yet another strategic alliance. Searches for Vera Wang tuxedos blew past established names in the formal wear business.

In our ongoing investigation into this story eWedNewz learned that the greater demand and brand recognition the higher the risk of being imitated, copied and tampered with. In the case of Giorgio Armani the probability of being copied bears the greatest risk of creating excellent designs. Descriptions and accounts of fake Armani products concludes  imitation really is the sincerest form of flattery; we haven’t found many accounts of pirates copying styles or products that nobody wants.

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

Jean Yves Never Believed in Get Married

By Paul Pannone

Sources denouncing Get Married continue to come forward to tell of horrible experiences in dealing with the company, only to find out the result was not what they expected.  In a story that dates back five years and continues to take on a life of its own, eWedNewz sources are coming forward to say they’re not surprised the company is folding.

Multiple sources name the New Year’s Eve wedding in Times Square as the beginning of the end for Get Married. But readers responding to the eWNz coverage say it’s also a turning point and how  spending decisions for wedding marketing-advertising dollars will change. Marketing experts are expecting the change, as news of how exactly the Get Married failure happened. Most agree the days of free-spending other people’s money are over.

“I think a large percentage of the folks that rushed into the bridal world when they lost their corporate gigs or graduated university and couldn’t find a job will give up. It isn’t the “paved in gold”  party all the time, recession proof industry they thought it was,” writes Christine Boulton in her Get Married piece.

 

The Get Married Times Square was a financial disaster from the word go. Our apologies to the happy couple and members of the wedding, you guys were great!

 

High-level sources at Get Married told eWedNewz the company paid Countdown Entertainment 250,000 dollars for the rights to stage the wedding in New York.

“It really was the last chance to turn the company around and make it practical to move past all the mismanagement and lost revenue; but it was probably too far gone at that point,” according to a Get Married Source speaking under anonymity.

According to ex-Get Married managers, sponsor’s that included David’s Bridal and others could not be convinced to pay the type of dollars needed to offset the cost to make the Times Square project cost-effective.

“All I gave were the tuxedos, I had no clue what the financial shape of the company was at that point,” said Maurice Silva of Formal Wear International in Florida.

Silva said he went with the percentages of getting his products placed but admits nothing really earth shattering resulted from his involvement.

“It’s the type of thing that you just don’t know until you look back and say, would I do it again? But I do know it sounds impressive to our little industry and might encourage some of them to step up and update some of the questionable products that are out there,” he told eWNz.

Silva is known for his marketing prowess and advertising talents, beating up publications he feels are dead or dying for better rates and value-added promotions. Mr. Silva told eWedNewz he was not particularly impressed with Get Married and underscored the fact he never would have paid a dime to have his products featured at the New Year’s eve event.

 

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2011