Equality Declares Munaluchi is Colorless

By Paul Pannone

Munaluchi Bride magazine gained the attention and praise of another wedding industry segment that connects with their mission and herald the changes that are coming. Statements by the head of Munaluchi, Chike Kwobu, got the attention of Marcinho Savant, a proponent and advocate of human rights, regardless of race, color or sexual preferences.

 

Marcinho Savant  has what it takes– the “O” factor– and uses it to get his message heard.

 

After welcoming Kwobu into a sometimes volatile Wedding water Cooler environment, Savant commented on an eWedNewz story saying:

Bravo, Mr. Nwobu and “Munaluchi Bride” magazine!

Every Bride matters. All brides want to “see” themselves reflected and acknowledged in the broader society. Brides of Color have been invisible, or relegated to special, occasional, “sections” in mainstream black publications because they had no true home. In Munaluchi Bride, now they do! And it’s about time!
According the magazine’s blog:  ”The name “Munaluchi” is a combination of two African names (one Ethiopian and the other Nigerian) which when fused together mean “Beautiful Work of God.” The name perfectly describes our target audience, as all women, regardless of race or ethnicity are beautiful in their own light.”

I’d say they’ve hit the nail on the head!  Asante sana, Munaluchi Bridal!  Thank you for providing a home for all the “Munaluchi” on the planet!

 

According to Savant love comes in all shapes and forms but the color restrictions are clear; none.

“As an event Designer I am here 24/7 for the couple to make things happen for them the week of their event. When two people are in love and are willing to dedicate their lives to one another they need to have a great event to mark the official start of their life together. That’s where I come in,” according Mr. Oprah Savant.

 

 

 

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

Cautious Optimism as Proposition 8 Gets Struck Down in California

 

By Paul Pannone

In what’s being called a narrow victory the California court system struck down the state’s voter-passed ban on gay marriage saying it violates the rights of gays in California.

 

Judge Stephen Reinhardt said Proposition lessens the status and human dignity of humans– and not just in California.

 

According to Judge Stephen Reinhardt

“Proposition 8 serves no purpose, and has no effect, other than to lessen the status and human dignity of gays and lesbians in California, and to officially reclassify their relationships and families as inferior to those of opposite-sex couples.”

The news is just another dip in what’s called a roller-coaster ride by conservative onlookers that say they’ve heard it before.

“I am going to stay very cautious until time passes and I’m absolutely certain it’s for real,” says Marcinho Savant.

Savant celebrated the legalization of same-sex marriage in New York over the 2011 summer saying, “THIS is the question of the hour!  Running a company specifically designed to care for and protect the weddings of the GLBTI community it is, of course, an interesting proposition that New York (and other states) have recognized full marriage equality. But are we turning back handsprings yet?  No.  We’ve been here from the beginning!  Our doors have been open for each of the legalization in California, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Vermont, Iowa, New Hampshire and the District of Columbia.  There hasn’t been a “flood” of same-gender marriage bookings, as a result. It’s been much more like a steady flow. In fact, I feel a lot of couples are still ‘waiting for the other shoe to drop’; possibly for their rights to be rescinded, as was the case in California.

Savant’s cautiousness continues with today’s latest announcement, issuing the following statement to eWedNewz:

 ”Today’s ruling by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals, declaring Proposition 8 unconstitutional is a great victory for GLBTI couples in California, to be sure.  I am unaware, at the moment, when marriages will be permitted to resume in the state.  And what happens to the nearly 20,000 licenses already issued to GLBTI couples—  All those couples who tied the knot, only to have it forcibly unraveled before their eyes.

We have already seen the power of the ballot in the hands of a majority who, for their own personal reasons, felt that their views took precedence over fair treatment under the law.  The law passed, they (the opponents) created an initiative and the people voted— declaring and amending the California Constitution to read that marriage could only exist between a male and a female couple.   Led by the ProtectMarriage.com, which garnered the public support of major political figures such as Newt Gingrich and John McCain, a great hue and cry went up to reverse the ruling granting full marriage equality to the residents of the state.

An object lesson in the power of the a constitutional voter initiative, I am cautious about this power, though many hearts and minds seem to have changed since the time of the proposition’s passing. Nobody has the right to VOTE on the liberties of another, law-abiding citizen. It’s as absurd as my thinking I have the right to vote on whether my neighbor has the right to own an aquarium in their house, because I’m afraid of, or just plain hate— EELS!  I’m not lacing up my dancing shoes quite yet, because there is the possibility that there will be, yet another, appeal— though unlikely.

It is abhorrent to me as a human being to think that the couples, already legally married, then not, now possibly again “legally wed”— to think that they could, yet again, have their marriages hammered around like a  Wimbledon Finals volley, nauseate me; that we as human beings are willing to inflict such harm upon others.  There is no gray area in equality.

After what these Californian couples and families have been through, I believe they’ll be cautiously celebratory as well today. Wedding vendors would be wise to be ready for, and highly sensitive to, the battered emotions of this demographic and their future wedding needs.  For now, until couples are assured of their irrevocable right to marry, expect a trickle. Not a flood.”

 

 eWedNewz continues our coverage and investigation into this story. We welcome your thoughts.

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

All Things Savant Suggest Charity and Caring

 

By Paul Pannone

 

Event,  lifestyle expert and author, Marcinho Savant, authorized the creation of a new charity concern nearly a year ago to help others. Affectionately known as Mar Mar, Savant’s name is not the only curious part of this very intricate person.  Mar Mar’s charitable approach to life extends beyond his services to the wedding industry; Savant celebrates life every day.

The learned Savant boarders on brilliance and silly fun, often crossing that boarder at any given moment without a passport. But when it comes to business Savant is all about business, taking each project he undertakes seriously.

His book, Sell or Starve, is a frank account of life during one of the worst economic crisis in the history of the United States and demonstrates how Savant approaches life, always with a realistic perspective and equal expectations.

 

Marcinho Savant plans weddings that are elegant, fun or totally creative.

In all of Marcinho’s undertakings his passion clearly rests on creating interesting and unique events for his clients. With the same understanding, caring and attention to detail he oversees all his business concerns, Savant takes  planning an event for his clients very seriously.

A new e brochure features products and details about what his company offers. But it’s more about the person behind the planning that keeps us interested and watching what this amazing human being is doing.

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

The Wedding Water Cooler Gets to the Bottom of Issues

By Paul Pannone

The Wedding Water Cooler is shifting gears again and breaking through the politically correct ceiling that members say keeps the wedding industry from becoming a better place for everyone. Members of WWC say they love the format that is free of clutter and having to act, walk or even talk in any particular way, opening the door to free expression, lucid discussions and at the end a conclusion.

Professional in the group say they’re concerned in how the public perceives the wedding business. Professionals behaving badly is a concern to WWC members interacting with each other. For over two months, members are deciding which fellow members are real and which are full of shit. The real ones are making their feelings known and taking fellow members to task, leaving them bruised and battered.

Denise Newell told eWedNewz she is sick and tired of the way things are in the wedding business.

 

“The good part about that is, it only has to happen once. Anyone hearing or reading about it becomes well-aware of what to expect if they decide to join,” according to Marcino Savant.

Savant and the growing voice of WWC is permeating out to the wedding industry, warning those with something to hide to stay away. Savant and other members say they’ve been quietly observing the action and fully understand why the groups effect on the business continues to grow. Both told eWedNewz they expect changes to come slowly but they eventually will come.

“I find it quite interesting because I am sick and tired of how things are in the wedding business. Everything is sugar-coated in a “professional way” yet the same professionals will not think twice about stabbing you in the back when you turn away,” according to Denise “Dee Dee” Newell.  

Newell bills herself as a “mentor” but says it’s an honor to teach others what she knows and help them get started. According to Newell, better professionals creates a better wedding industry. Newell also informed eWN there is no charge for the courtesy.

“It does get frustrating at times but I do what I can to overcome the frustration. What gets me is the sugar-coated information that never really gets to the heart of the matter. I’ve been in many forums and groups but none come close to what’s taking place in the Cooler,” according to Newell.

Newell and her fellow-Canadian members, Sheryl Davies and Sandra Aaron, actively participate in the debates, asking specific questions about the wedding industry, organizations and personalities that leave nothing to the imagination in WWC discussions. Hard questions and fiery debates conducted in an irreverent way cuts through the saccharin and gets to the heart of matters that members say really “matter”.

Both Newell and Savant apologized for not participating as much as they’d like. Both told eWN they’ve been busy but are very aware of the discussions. We informed them, no apology was necessary and welcomed them to nominate others they work with to join the group.

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2011 

 

 

 

 

 

A Situation Storm Props Up Tuxedos; Major Wedding Experts Weigh In

 

By Paul Pannone

Top eWedNewz story involves a character from TV’s Jersey Shore, the Situation. A deal between FLOW Formal and the “Sitch” is causing a viral tidal wave of publicity spanning across all mediums including television, print and Internet. Details of the deal, fueled by dubious notoriety of the Situation raises awareness for the troubled tuxedo business in its quest to overcome the challenges facing the iconic “tux.

The story appears in major media sources and could be what the doctor ordered for the putrid perception of the tuxedo, opening the door for the main focus of the arrangement; the product. Since TMZ picked up on the eWedNewz release, mention of tuxedos on blogs, television shows and newspapers captures the attention of the decision-maker; consumers, like never before.

Countless Face Book “Likes” on the story and strong, positive statements by major tuxedo business leaders suggest success for the launch that will follow all the hoopla. So far, growing demand outweighs FLOW’s ability to satisfy the interest. So why is there any negativity about the deal?

eWedNewz asked experts in the Wedding Water Cooler what they thought about the deal and some of the negativity. The response from the WWC panel right up to date with today’s market reality.

Wedding analyst, Christine Boulton, told eWedNewz, “The guy is a gossip magnet with a lot of haters, but it still raises the profile of tuxedos overall.”

Boulton, known for her own edgy, straight-forward candor, underscores reality in everything she does. Boulton’s market perception, uncanny ability to find tends and translate them to her clients has earned her a respected place in the wedding business and her peers.

Wendy Hartigan told eWWn, “He is a celebrity.  He is young and hip.  He is even a “dancing star”.  FLOW is in the business of selling tuxedos and if  the Situation can sell tuxedos to a younger audience–  GO FOR IT!   He isn’t a porn star.  He isn’t a criminal.   And, my guess is there are lots of young women, in high school or getting married, that think he is HOT. 

Celebrities have been endorsing products from milk to jeans for decades.  The media was all up in arms when Brooke Shields was Calvin Klein’s spokeswoman ( or girl, as it were).  They thought that was inappropriate too. She sold lots of jeans and she grew up to be a functional adult, as did most of the kids that bought the jeans. I would certainly steer a client to this new and edgy type of tuxedo. In fact, I am working on an article about edgy brides and innovative weddings in unusual places, with ‘out of the box’ themes. These tuxes would be a perfect fit. It isn’t easy to find guys wedding fashion that is ‘out of the box’.”

The Wedding Water Cooler is composed of an eclectic cross-section experts with liberal, moderate and conservative views. Professions ranging from national bridal show promoters, top bridal dress manufacturers, media sources, event planners and even men’s formal wear experts, creates a dynamic forum, resulting in creative thinking. The common denominator is open-minded idea sharing and understanding today’s consumer.

Respected wedding and travel expert, Jacqueline Johnson said, “Any product mention is a good thing. At the end of the day you are looking for awareness which will translate into sales. Like it or not both the Situation and TMz have a following and that audience will end up buying what is worn or promoted. Congratulations (to FLOW) on a brilliant marketing strategy.”

Johnson sits on the board of tourism for over thirty Caribbean countries as a valued consultant, marketer and speaker. Other highly successful members of the Wedding Water Cooler includes Steve Lang of Mon Cheri. Lang and Mon Cheri recently celebrated a 20-year anniversary attended by a prestigious gathering of industry notables. Lang weighed into the discussions, paralleling how he leverages star power and how it relates to the controversy experienced by the deal.

“I think it is the right move; the formal wear  industry, both male and female clothing, needs a face lift. This is why Mon Cheri is licensing top name talent like Kathy Hilton (Paris’s mom and star in her own right), Kathy Ireland, and is about to announce another new relationship this month with great star power and TV presence. It is also why I have created a 50/50 partnership with one of the top movie executives in Hollywood with 60 movies to her credit, to create new and interesting TV programs centered on the industry.

It is the way of the future. FLOW did the right thing. Years ago movies made the star, it has morphed to reality based entertainment and this is where the young people of today and tomorrow will reside. People do not want to see so much scripted material; they want real life and something  they can relate to,” according to Lang.

Lang recently told eWedNewz his business is up 20% over 2010 sales figures and feels it could go as high as 30% by year’s end. Coincidence? How about on the Celebrity end?

Celebrity event designer, Samantha Goldberg, told eWedNewz,” I have to admit, I cannot stomach the show. However, being on reality TV, I work with all types of people associated with industry events. I think FLOW was ingenious in their approach.
 
Whether or not people like “The Sitch” has no merit as to why this would not work– or that FLOW is “retarded” (Quoted from many if you search the web) for choosing him.

People need to separate what they like/not like personally from their business decisions. How can they bash FLOW (or anyone) for making a smart decision to jump on the bandwagon? Most of the opinions are of those who are bitter, unemployed and watch for things to complain about or critique. Does that mean they are stupid? No, it means FLOW has a great marketing team that’s doing what it was designed to do.” 

 

Celebrity event planner, Samantha Goldberg, accompanied by other members of the Wedding Water Cooler, understand marketing. The panel of experts know how to put aside personal preferences and make solid business decisions for their organizations.

 

 Equality event planner, Marcinho Savant, agrees with Goldberg saying,”As a man of a certain age, I can understand that “The Sitch” is a pop icon and cash cow. Yes, an icon. So, anyone who harnessed the star power of this ‘heart-throb’ figure, while it’s still on “Fire” is a genius!  He is, in fact, the only voice reaching out to his audience/demographic, bringing formal wear, and it’s discussion, back into vogue among them.  The garments don’t wear him— He wears them well.  Appreciate the person or not, the decision is, for the moment, absolutely BRILLIANT!”

For over 11 years, eWNz warned the formal wear business of the impending social changes and how they would eventually affect the tuxedo business. In 2000 the warnings were shrugged off but by 2007, the departure of thousands of formal wear stores left with only a handful of surviving manufacturers to service them– major formal wear sources began to take notice.

By 2009, in the midst of the worse economic climate since the Great Depression, the formal wear business is left with only a few merchandise providers. Rising to the top of manufacturers is FLOW; owned by the financially robust Weintraub Organization.

Specific commitments made by owner, Jeff Weintraub, manifested in the ability to make national news for a boring product like tuxedos– that are at the lowest level of priority in event planning– only solidifies the capacity to make good on all of his promises.

eWedNewz watches every step taken at FLOW, as the rest of the world watches eWedNewz.

Thoughts?

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2011

 

 

Wedding Planner Sticks to Original Plan; Brides Not Allowed

By Paul Pannone

The word “wedding” is synonymous with bride; the event is all about the bride and rightfully so. But eWedNewz  watches the emerging trend to defend the rights of the groom; not that they need defending but simply put, they’ve not had any rights until now. Groom’s thoughts and feeling have traditionally been squashed by the bride and her mother, particularly if the bride’s parents paid for the wedding. But according to recent information, that is changing now that couples are funding their own weddings.

But does it make good business sense to direct all the attention to the groom in any part of wedding planning? It depends on who you ask. For the most part traditional thinking planners take the findings of major wedding intelligence like Great Bridal Expo and find reasons not to carry out the findings. CEO of GBE, Bill Heaton, gave a strong statement in favor of grooms getting more involved in wedding planning. Heaton told eWedNewz of a rising participation rate (up to 40% in some cities) and greater response in all facets of wedding planning.

Should brides be allowed into a groom-only event?

 

eWedNewz learned of a case where one planner is sticking to her original idea to give total attention to the groom; a move contested by a partnership overture that suggested the bride somehow be included. Diane Freeland of Events of Sophistication recently launched a groom-only project called Cigar & Cuff Links with the idea of not having brides anywhere near the event.

“That’s what makes it unique and special for the groom– only. I’ve been contacted by companies that want to partner in the project but want me to change my idea and include brides,” she told eWedNewz.

 

Freeland’s thoughts were posted in the Wedding Water Cooler for comment to see what other members thought. Nearly all supported her decision to stick to her original idea based on the fact there is so much attention given to the bride already. To include her in any shape or form would water down results, according to the replies.

In the same trenches as Freeland, wedding planner, Khalilah Olokunola advised, “Grooms are an untouched market for shows and for most of the industry with the exception of tuxedos. We’ve assumed for too long that they didnt want to be involved but this past weekend’s event proved me wrong. Most of the planning was with Brian; the groom who wanted his own area signature to his career and likes, so the cocktail hour was all about him. Some of the touches - the drink– was called the badge- made with coffee and Kahlua paired with a on site donut bar and yes he is a cop! This is becoming more of a trend; and when the groom doesn’t want it, the bride wants something special for him!” according to Olokunola. 

 In marketing and advertising, Freeland’s decision is supported by statements from Sheryl Davies and Jim Duhe, both in the media business.

Davies said, “Keep the project limited to Grooms only. Brides do their thing and they still don’t come to shows with the numbers of grooms-to-be we are told are helping them plan their weddings. Make it a classy, exclusive event with lots of sizzle and do a lot of promo and if you build it they will come. The key is to make it attractive and macho for the guys. (sorry but it’s a marketing fact) Do what you need to do to make them curious, special and engage them.

This is a new step forward in the wedding industry and guys tend to travel better in a pack of other males.” 

Duhe’s position  also favors sticking to the original plan, feeling there is too much attention given to the bride.

“There already are more bride/groom shows in this country than are countable.  Does the world need another one?  No AND Yes. I assume that Diane’s purpose in launching CIGARS & CUFF LINKS was to create something innovative and successful. Frankly, I haven’t seen a highly successful “grooms only” event before.  That doesn’t mean that it may not or can’t exist.  It’s just that I haven’t personally seen one. I don’t believe that a “grooms only” program is conceptually flawed. People who attempted it in the past may have had developmental problems or an errors in execution.  Maybe Diane has calculated a way around these issues.  If she has . . . congratulations!  Don’t change it to include brides — build upon it to create an even stronger “groom only” event.  There are many out here who will help you in any way that they can,” feels Duhe.

More applause came from planner, Marcinho Savant, that gave Freeland a thumbs up for sticking to her original plan.

“Sticking to one’s guns indicates integrity, courage, confidence, faith, grit and strength!  KUDOS! There’s a vast difference between sticking to one’s guns, stubbornly, endlessly and CHOOSING to hold on to one’s vision with bold, industry-changing bravery and mettle!  Clearly, Ms. Freeland BELIEVES in and trusts in her market analysis. She trusts in her vision and in her mission. Congrats to her bold foray into uncharted waters!  COWARDS NEVER THRIVE! I hope she makes a zillion dollars and claims her niche in the market.  BRAVA!

In a clear, concise voice, the Wedding Water Cooler learns how to stay ON TOPIC and give correct, lucid information to help its members and give wedding industry members a chance to weigh in on their conclusions.

Now it’s your turn. Should brides be included in a “groom’s only” project? Post your thoughts here or contact us privately at Paul@ewednewz.com or 516-312-0090

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2011 

 

Same-sex Weddings Start in New York but what’s the Upside for Vendors?

 

By Paul Pannone

Thirty days after same-sex marriage became law in New York nuptials pronouncing ”you’re married” began a minute after midnight on Sunday, July 34th, 2011. But whether the flood of requests for marriage licenses represents a boon or bust for the wedding business is unknown.

764 (added) weddings took place on the first day of eligibility in New York City, setting a one-day record. Great for equality and human rights but what does it actually net for wedding vendors and professionals? According to sources many of the weddings assembled last-minute used goods and services composed mainly of DIY, self-service and makeshift items– which is again great but– what about the value to vendors?

Equality proponent, Marchinho Savant, says he is taking it slow, based on the current lack of enthusiasm shown towards planned celebration of same-sex events.

 

Wedding sources that asked to not be identified questioned the value of  bouquets made up of flowers picked in the garden or simple champagne toasts held at neighborhood restaurants.

The questions are consistent with expert sources, including Marcinho Savant, proponent of equal rights. In an eWedNewz exclusive interview, Savant said he prefers to err on the side of caution with his business, instead of getting caught up in the trappings of overexhuberence.

“I prefer to stay sane, measured, strategic and grateful for our little constant flow.  As of this moment, other than a slew of post-NY marriage equality ruling inquiries (dozens), our booking meter remains steady— as if NY’s ruling was a mirage.  Or, perhaps, couples are biding their time to avoid, at all costs, another California wherein 18,000+ same-gender-loving couples won, and then LOST, their right to marriage equality— at the hands and at the whim of their neighbors,” Savant told eWNz.

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved
2011

Same-sex Weddings Proceed with Caution, So Far; Will NY Move the Needle?

 

By Paul Pannone

Legalization of same-sex marriage was first thought a boon for the wedding business but an ongoing eWedNewz investigation is so-far turning up information that suggests it may never happen. In general,marriage decline began in 1984 when the population was around 235 million people and has steadily declined every decade since. In 1984 we approached but never officially reached 2.5 million weddings.

Today’s population of over 310 million shows weddings continue to decline and are now under 2.1 million; the lowest since 1968. The drop called “precipitous” by experts watching the numbers, stop short of saying whether we’re near stabilization.

According to the Population Reference Bureau,” Marriage rates have dropped precipitously among young adults ages 25 to 34 during the past decade and the decline has accelerated since the onset of the recession, according to PRB’s analysis of new data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2009 American Community Survey (ACS) and 2010 Current Population Survey (CPS). The data suggest that more young couples are delaying marriage or foregoing matrimony altogether, likely as an adaptive response to the economic downturn and decline in the housing market.

Experts in the wedding market that expect legalization of same-sex marriages to boost revenue in the sagging wedding industry could be disappointed. So far a start/stop, discord in California, near failure in Chicago and less than an enthusiastic response so far in New York are not consistent with early expectations.

eWedNewz digs deeper and discussed the events with Marcinho Savant, a long-time proponent of equal rights. We asked Savant if the new law in New York will ramp up the market and boost wedding industry revenue as a result.

 

Brian Brown, identified as a pundit of Same-Sex marriage by Marcinho Savant in an eWedNewz interview, could be part of the reason same-sex marriages move forward with caution.

 

THIS is the question of the hour!  Running a company specifically designed to care for and protect the weddings of the GLBTI community it is, of course, an interesting proposition that New York (and other states) have recognized full marriage equality. But are we turning back handsprings yet?  No.  We’ve been here from the beginning!  Our doors have been open for each of the legalization in California, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Vermont, Iowa, New Hampshire and the District of Columbia.  There hasn’t been a “flood” of same-gender marriage bookings, as a result. It’s been much more like a steady flow. In fact, I feel a lot of couples are still ‘waiting for the other shoe to drop’; possibly for their rights to be rescinded, as was the case in California.

New York, on the other hand is a different matter.  California was able to remove the rights granted, because they have access to ballot initiatives, thereby giving the ‘people’ the right to vote on this, or any other issue they want.  California gave the people the right to decide on civil liberties based on religious MORES— not on equal treatment under the law. 

Happily, New York has no such vehicle that I’m aware of.  So while it is unlikely that marriage equality will be reversed, Brian Brown, President of National Organization for Marriage  (NOM) has countered with ‘NOM To GOP Senators: “We Pledge $2 Million to Reverse Same-Sex Marriage in New York”’ with a bill and strategy that would attempt to eradicate the current one, about to become settled law.  The organization even plans to conduct “Marriage Rallies Across New York this Sunday – Join Us!” 

So, with an entire organization rabidly devoted to taking recently granted rights away from NY residents, are people going to splash out for platinum weddings, what that Sword of Damocles hanging over their heads?  Not so much.  With an entire movement hell-bent on getting revenge on fair-minded politicos, are couples breaking limbs to cross the line?  They’re testing the water with their toes, in many cases, like one does by sticking one’s toes in the water first to get the feel.  And speaking of breaking limbs; nobody likes a “Circus” — not on one the most important and, especially, significant days and periods of their life.

We’ve seen the Chicago debacle: Huge build up, rancorous assassination attempts of competitive organizers, other event participants, and this writer and the drama what happened?  Nothing!

I prefer to stay sane, measured, strategic and grateful for our little constant flow.  As of this moment, other than a slew of post-NY marriage equality ruling inquiries (dozens), our booking meter remains steady— as if NY’s ruling was a mirage.  Or, perhaps, couples are biding their time to avoid, at all costs, another California wherein 18,000+ same-gender-loving couples won, and then LOST, their right to marriage equality— at the hands and at the whim of their neighbors.

Our “perfect-fit” clients, the buyers, not the shoppers, have and will continue to seek us out.  In the interim, the ready masses will carpe their diem, this week and weekend!  It’s SUCH an important time for us all.

I’ll just continue keeping this ship on course, ready to turn Hard to Port, to pick up those passengers finding themselves in need of a ride. Otherwise, it remains business, as wonderful, and usual.  Steady and fulfilling.

I congratulated our brothers and sisters on the day it happened— That stunning moment when we were just like everybody else and could marry the one we loved.   We’ve been here.  I’ve been here. I’m not going anywhere.  But we stay, at the ready, to serve those who need our special brand of care.  And like I said…  Congratulations, New York!!!!!!

My humble recommendation to colleagues: Be ready to serve, do your homework.  Be READY for the time when YOUR phone rings.  I wouldn’t, however, bet the farm on an influx of GLBTI bookings just yet. :)   Not just yet.

Savant’s statement favors the emotional side of the current scenario, yet remains optimistically cautious. But a unique, data-guided view provided by Jim Duhe gives business-minded reasoning behind why this market has not yet shown financial success, so far.

I created a detailed business plan for a same-sex bridal publication as a (coffee table book) in the 1990′s. I assumed that it was only a matter of time before the laws were changed to support marriage for everyone. I’ve always been an optimist and an opportunist.

Based upon a number of different trade and consumer studies, the magazine would have been a tremendous advertising success but a horrifying circulation failure. Unfortunately, I don’t believe that much has changed in 20 years. Therefore there is no point in moving forward with this project.

As long as “the people” are permitted to modify laws that can deny civil rights to any group of citizens, marriage will be caught in the middle. Don’t most people wonder what would have happened in the 1960′s had “the people” of Mississippi, Louisiana, or Georgia been allowed to dictate laws regarding segregation based upon popular vote majority? That “the people” could or should be empowered to deprive any group of citizens the rights granted by the constitution doesn’t make the deprivation of rights legal,” said Duhe in response to Wedding Water Cooler discussions.

Underscoring Duhe’s difficult business decision that contrasts his opinion not to pursue the project he feels;

“Some day, Americans will look back at this period in history as foolish and counterproductive.”

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2011

 

The Wedding Business Faces an Aging Population

 

By Paul Pannone

Every day for the next few decades, thousands of baby boomers will turn 65.  Census figures say  the median age of Americans has been steadily rising since 1970. The Census Bureau projects that the over-65 population will more than double between 2000 and 2050.

You tell em grandma!

In 1900, one American in 25 was 65 or over; in 1984, one in nine. The Census Bureau predicts that, by 2050, one in five Americans will be 65 or over. The 85 and over bracket grows even more rapidly, expected to triple in size by 2020.

Armed with that information why aren’t more wedding professionals taking the shift into account? The truth is some wedding professionals are not taking the information into consideration, as shown by reaction to the opening statement in an eWedNewz story last week that read:

If you think back to a time when life was simpler and you made a lot of money in the wedding business as you read this piece, let’s face it; you’re old. It’s alright being old, it happens to all of us. But what’s not alright is to think old or, according to some, to think at all. Times have changed and they’re never going back to what once was.

Wedding Water Cooler members– especially older ones– picking up on the story gave their views on the age-old question of how old is old.

“As the oldest (but still best looking) guy involved with Wedding Water Cooler, I don’t think that you have anything to defend.  Your comments were direct and to the point.  Who is complaining?” asked Jim Duhe.

The private replies came from people who didn’t want to not be named. Most were middle-aged; some were young. But all think old.

Marcinho Savant tells eWedNewz, “I’m a middle-aged man. I accept, and EMBRACE, my mortality, but do not dwell on it. I enjoy the privilege of age which assures that I do not have to do ANY damned thing I don’t WISH to. I take a LOT less CRAP these days!  I move a little more slowly these days; sometimes it takes me a minute, or FIVE, to recall that name, or grocery list or phone numbers that I once could rattle off like a popcorn popper (Remember those!?), BUT, I do NOT think “old”.  If I would, I’d be “dead”— and FAR sooner than ordained. I think BLESSED and FORTUNATE.”

 

Are you tired, run-down, listless? Do you poop out at parties? Are you unpopular? Are you OLD?

 

The marrying age in the United States and Canada has steadily risen since the 1980′s. While the Canadian market mirrors the US in most instances, our neighbors to the north are slightly higher in average marrying age (brides 31.7 years old and grooms 34.3), where both are still under thirty in the US.

eWedNewz continues our coverage of this story and welcomes your views either public or private. Post them here or Paul@ewednewz.com or 516-312-0090.

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2011

Is the Wedding Business in a Degenerative State?

 

By Paul Pannone

The changing state of the wedding business since the economic collapse in 2007 is known to all. Couples to wedding suppliers of goods and services are now faced with dealing with the new realities, not just lamenting about them.

Discussions in the Wedding Water Cooler suggest a lessening need for surveys, polls or even information about what happened over the last three years. Members say it’s time to stop beating the dead horse, bury it and move on. The idea that people demand more and are willing to pay for less is nothing new, according to the discussions. But few disagree, wedding data that looks back on the past several years offers little or no insight to what happens next.

No one needs another survey to know weddings are in trouble. Instead of looking back and lamenting, Wedding Water Cooler experts discuss solutions.

 

Local and Celebrity planners and members of WWC poking fun at unrealistic expectations for events with limited financial budgets became serious when asked if the wedding business is in a degenerating state.

“Yes, we all understand something happened. OK, so now what? Where do we go from here? Do we keep looking back, remain as we are or do something that may actually help the situation?” asks Jim Duhe.

His analytical style sparked debate in WWC discussions that sounded good but offered little or no direction at first. Determined to make his point, Duhe offered the following statement this morning that garnered some serious statements from other members of the group.

The word “degenerative” has a derogatory connotation.  It implies that marriage is degraded — reduced to a state that implies shame. You’re looking for a sound bite response to a complex question. In her book The Art of Marriage, Catherine Blyth notes that the range of acceptable replies to the BIG question were limited to “Yes”, “No”, ”When?” and “Ask me later.”  In the twenty-first century, however, the question begs a new reply:  “What for?”

According to Blyth, the first recorded exchange of wedding rings took place in Egypt in 2790 B.C.  However, marriage as we know it today didn’t exist until the Catholic Church created its  holy sacraments in the Council of Trent in 1547. Marriages have been evolving ever since.  There was no way that Pope Julius III could have foretold that same-sex marriage would be legalized in 2011.  Has it escaped attention that people are FIGHTING for marriage rights.  Therefore, to say that opinions about marriage are degenerating is less than accurate.

Today, marriage has far less to do with religious requirements or social demands than it does with human psychology.   Old men become cynical about marriage through the years.  However, it remains that having love accepted and receiving love in return is perhaps the most spectacular thing that life can offer to us.  It’s a natural reaction to want to make the bond permanent.  For the majority of us, that means that we look forward to married life.  Straight or gay, bisexual or transgender — it’s universal psychology.

Because of the unreported number of off-shore destination weddings, it’s impossible to calculate the actual number of marriages in the United States.  However, even if the numbers are slipping, there’s no legitimate research to prove that marriage is an unacceptable arrangement. Regardless of what people are doing in Hollywood or on TV, marriage is still the ideal for most of us.

The laws that govern divorce have as much or more to do with the contemporary view of marriage than anything else.  Culturally, we’re told that if you’re unhappy with your marriage, it’s acceptable to end it before financial complications become too intense.  In short, get the hell out of Dodge immediately. For many couples, divorce is hiding around the corner every time an argument rears its head. Nobody wants to see first hand how married bliss degenerates (yes degenerates) into bitter frustration and resentment.  Unfortunately, many  people of marriageable age have been part of a divorced family. They don’t want to repeat their parent’s mistakes.

The only people who are complaining about the condition of American weddings are those who earn their living from it.  However, most business people agree that it’s pointless to complain about any problem.  Complaints won’t/can’t address social issues.  Bridal industry professionals complain because they don’t like and can’t accept change.  Yes.  Marriages are different today than they were 10, 20, 30, 40, or 50 years ago.  Look in the mirror.  Everything — all of us — change over the years.  Why is it unreasonable to accept business changes?” said Duhe. 

Curiously, Duhe acknowledged the word “degenerates” in his statement. Duhe’s statement polarized the group’s discussion, forcing members to choose a position and substantiate their views. 

Wedding analyst, Christine Boulton, told eWedNewz, “Rather than a degenerative state, I think that the wedding industry is in a state of change. Weddings are still important milestones but the way we celebrate then is changing. They are more about meaning and family and friends than spectacle and impressing the neighbors. As a result, the things couples choose to spend on are shifting.

 

Wedding planner, Wendy Hartigan, weighed in saying, “I read Jim’s response first, before commenting.  I can’t disagree with him.  He makes several good points. I see in my interaction with brides there are weddings being planned “for the party” and not for the “life” being embarked on with a wedding being the first step.

As with many things in life, the latest legal decision being one totally unrelated to weddings, we are a disposable nation. Nothing is meant to last; not even human life.   Not much is valued, not even our children.    In disposing of my mother’s household in order to sell the house, I find that no one is interested in the old books, antique furniture, even the grand lady that is the house of 170 years and full of local history.   So, it is no surprise that marriage has fallen victim to the temporary and instant gratification that is our society.  

Is the wedding business in a degenerative state? Yes, the BUSINESS of weddings is deteriorating FAST!   There are still brides with good taste and a reasonable budget to have an elegant and memorable wedding.  But, the glut of wannabe vendors Craigslist DJ’s, photographers and caterers, the online dress business and the insane number of women that plan a wedding or a birthday party for family and then decide they have what it takes to be a professional, have changed the face of the business as a whole.  Then, you have the DIY craze; thank you Martha Stewart!.  A wedding is not an arts and crafts project.  And, there is no way that a bride can bake her cake, arrange her flowers, make her dress, her favors, her invitations and her table linens and not have it look like a kindergarten class’s art project, not to mention be exhausted and stressed to the max on her wedding day.   There are very few people with integrity, with common sense and with a sense of fair play.  Everyone wants to be a star and everyone wants the whole pie.  That is an unrealistic and selfish notion.  There is enough business for everyone if everyone would stick to his or her own field.   No one can DO IT ALL!   I was just speaking to a photographer the other day that feels strongly that quality is more important than quantity.   He also brought up a very good point.  In tracking his traffic to his site, he sees that brides click on the homepage and spend only seconds before they are gone.  What can you learn in seconds on line?   The internet, though a wonderful tool, cannot speak to a brides’ innermost desires.   Without reaching out and seeing the quality of the work and the person, how can you find vendors based on a few seconds on line? 

Until society as a whole makes the union of two people more important and more special, it won’t change.  And, until the brides and grooms looking for services understand that quality comes at a cost, that message boards and bartering in the square is not the way to hire vendors, it will continue to degenerate.   Real professionals, people who have spent their lives working, honing their talents, building a network of other professionals, will continue to close up shop because of all the Craigslist amateurs and the Knot brides’ big egos.   Not everyone is a star.  And, even some of the “stars” aren’t that good!!   Just because one has a bigger voice, a TV show or a local notoriety because they throw money around, doesn’t make them quality. Couples need to understand that quality is something that very few have.   And, yes, you get what you pay for.

People are losing what they have spent years building.   they are losing their homes, their livelihoods, their shirts. Bridal shops can’t compete with online impostors and David’s.    Florists can’t compete with Costco and Whole Foods.     Photographers can’t compete with students trying to build their portfolios.   And, couples getting married are too foolish to know the difference.   Education is key.   But, I have actually tried to be that voice and have been pushed aside by the “local heroes”, the tried and true voices of some of those “stars” I spoke of above.   Until someone is willing to stretch and hear a new voice, a new view, a more common sense approach, I fear the complaining will continue.

I spend the day reading, talking to people and being disgusted by the “whore” that this business has become.   Good taste, common sense and values have given way to cheap, back stabbing and greedy mongers of deceit and ego.   And, sadly, the bride doesn’t know she has been duped until it is too late.   In attempting to keep a roof over my head, I have been reduced to helping some of those $5000 budget brides.   Say what you will, but I have children to feed.   I don’t feel it cheapens my services.   I have the same mindset no matter the budget.  My tastes and my network are more geared to the upscale bride.   But, the market isn’t there for me.   So, I must do what will pay the bills.  If the hobbyists and the part time wannabes would move over, the whole industry could pick itself up and start over.   I try not to complain.   I just try to keep going the best I can.   I am eternally looking for that pony at the bottom of the box of manure!”

 

Marcinho Savant told eWedNewz, “ According to the PRB article entitled “In U.S., Proportion Married at Lowest Recorded Levels(by Mark Mather and Diana Lavery; September 2010) the ”marriage” business is in a degenerative state, and, by extension, so are weddings.  The lengthy and declarative article lists numerous indicators and explanations for that condition.  Dealing in fact does not equate with being negative, “gloom & doom” or the like.  We can choose to turn away from truth, and pay the hefty price for that ignorance.

The societal factors mentioned in the article are clear and logical.  So there is nothing that we can do, as an industry, to change relationship dynamics and mores at all.  Perhaps the next best step is to continue to escalate client care provisions, innovate client results, and master “outside the box” thinking in order to gain and secure the lion’s share of those couples still excited by weddings?  Attrition as a result of poverty should continue to cull out the hobbyists over the long run.  On the short, will remain the “I just got $500.00 to do a wedding for Julie”, “hand-to-mouth-ers”, living from event to event.  The problem, in these economic times, is that the scenario is largely sustainable, as long as people continue to have hard fiscal times and take whomever they can afford or cajole into planning their day.

With the market as saturated and overrun by vocational wedding “professionals” (who’d do a wedding for a pepperoni pizza and a six pack— “‘cuz it’s HELLA FUN!” and “It’s so exciting” or “It’s so EASY!”), as it is, we must master selling, and desirability, to those who seek, crave and can afford proper weddings.  Crying in our collective “champagne toast” is not only “alcohol abuse’”— it’s pointless.  Lamenting the state of affairs is a haunting tune, but it grows annoying and deadly after a few verses. 

We. Must. DO something— other than complaining.  There has never been a more clear call for the survival of the fittest.  While cliché, “Only the strong shall survive”.  Those who simply complain, without taking action and cooperating with other professionals, will just end up eating their cake out in the rain. We can only sell or starve.  If we continue to do the same things… the same way… we are in peril. I don’t believe we can “wait” this drier time out.  We need to PULL it out— by its EARS!

Many couples see weddings, on the whole, as a house payment, a corny ancient relic of the past or dumb and impractical.  We have to make weddings a “must have” in the minds of generation X and y people.  It has to be the coolest thing to do again.   Once it is, many will FIND a way to hire professionals, and in ways that won’t put them in harm’$ way. Remember how you SAVED in order to buy your dream car?   I say: Innovate.  Increase client value, educate… or step aside. :-) ,” feels Savant.

 

Newcomer to the group, Steve Lang, gave his views about the business side of the wedding business, mainly from a product standpoint.” There are many sides to the wedding business and most people lump them together as a single entity rather than seeing all the colors that make up the bridal prism. There are wedding gowns for sure, but there is only one person in white at the altar. There are so many other women at the affair that will buy dresses and multiple times in their lifetime.

Stores that define themselves as being in the wedding business are making a mistake. They are in the social occasion business.  One is like fishing in a river and one is like fishing  in an ocean. Let’s say there are 150 people at a  wedding. half of these are female and are recyclable customers.  There are only 2.4 million wedding a year in the USA and a third of second marriages or less formal marriages, 200,000 do not buy a dress so we are left with 1.4 million units. But think about guest of the wedding and mothers of the bride; then the unit potential becomes staggering.”

Lang’s statement became a practical application expression of how he managed to change with the times, and not resist the changes. Lang’s decision to leverage the power of the internet and traditional advertising– plus promote them in every possible channel– is the object of much jealousy from complaining competitors that choose to sniff his fumes instead of accepting the challenge of challenging Lang.

“Mon Cheri was a wedding gown manufacturer that dabbled in social occasion., we are now a huge social occasion company that also has a huge bridal business. I morphed our business years ago to match demographic trends; we make christening, communion, flower girls, tween dresses, first wedding, second wedding, prom, graduation dresses, maids, bridals, MOB, guest of the wedding, prom and more is coming. 

If you address the products under the bell curve of opportunities and your business mission is defined to encompass all the potential, you can prosper. All I can say is that growth is achievable but you have to make your own luck. You need to reinvent yourself continuously,” says Lang.

 When asked what could be done to turn things around in the business, Lang went out on a limb; something very few are willing to do in the wedding business, according to multiple sources.

“To turn things brighter for the whole industry we need change on many fronts. First, we need education. Retailers must be brought  up to speed on cutting edge  marketing and sales theory.  This has been an on-going activity at Mon Cheri and believe in investing in our stores. Benjamin Franklin said  that ‘education is an investment that pays dividends for life’.  I believe wholeheartedly in this and that is why we invest so much money into Mon Cheri Academy. We need more manufacturers to join us in helping stores.  It is their job, in my humble opinion,  to prepare stores to sell their product more effectively.

Second, we need wedding magazines and portals to concentrate on all aspects of the wedding business; dresses, tuxes, accessories, etc, where they traditionally fail. They must stop editorialized statement featuring expensive clothes exclusively; they can take a cue from Bridal Guide in this aspect of reporting on fashion.

Third, we need manufacturers to invest in design talent.  Too many just copy dresses and do not innovate.  I have 8 world-class designers and I am always looking at new ones.  I think that we need to invest more in talent as an industry.

On the issue of why so many complain, it is like voting. People who do not vote  (read “invest in themselves and change their thinking”) , should not complain about the state of the country  (industry). Complaining is easy, hard work is– well, work,” according to Lang

 

What’s your opinion? We’d like to know. Tell us here or contact Paul@ewednewz.com – 516-312-0090 

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2011