Infighting, Fragmentation and Fighting in the Tuxedo Business Could Hamper Comeback

By Paul Pannone

eWedNewz is watching a developing story with conflicting information to a recent resurgence of the men’s formal wear business. Tuxedo rentals have been in decline for over a decade and saw the closure of several founding companies including After Six.

 

When a customer walks into a tuxedo rental store they don’t know how old the garment is.

The original After Six company founded in 1902 made tuxedos in Philadelphia until it went out of business in 1993. The name bounced around the industry for decades after the original company closed and was even owned by the Allstate Insurance company (after Six 2 Baltimore 1994-1996) and the Sequa corporation (After Six 3 1996-2009), among other short-term ownership. What remains are products created years ago that still appear on many websites and showrooms across America, tainting the use of rented tuxedo.

 

According to IBISWorld spending is supposed to increase in various parts of wedding planning industries but the tuxedo business is expected to shrink in the next five-years.

 

51% of an ongoing poll so-far says the tuxedo rental industry is set for a comeback. Together with 26% who say the rental business is holding steady giving a 76% positive rating as opposed to 13% of respondents who feel the tuxedo rental business is dying; 3% say it’s already dead, giving a 16% negative view. 7% say they’re not sure.

Recent blogs by long-time wedding and event planners say the tuxedo business is due for a comeback, ready to service a new generation of users following young role model entertainers adorning the updated threads.

Forces opposing the comeback includes fragmentation in the tuxedo rental business. Lagging behind in technology,  presentation in stores and online. Word of suspect products that have been around for decades is reaching the consumer who are cautious and more aware about  what they’re wearing.  Internet searches for new items find updated styles by Vera Wang and Tony Bowls. New fit and softer fabrics attract new users who are willing to spend upwards of $200 dollars to rent the latest designs. Yet the traditional part of the tuxedo rental business remains stuck in price-wars fighting one another with old merchandise, old ideas and a very arrogant attitude.

Currently there are at least four recognized organizations in the tuxedo business: IFA, SIFA, Tuxedo Junction and SAVVI, each with their own membership, views and approach on marketing. A visit with some of the spokespeople in each of the organizations this week admitted personality conflicts and differences of opinion.

“That’s why there are so many different organizations in the business. There are some very strong personalities with prideful views who aren’t willing to work together,” said one member of the IFA, the original formal wear organization.

Quietly, each organization said they were formed to encourage manufacturers. In reality groups were formed to beat up manufacturers on price and getting them to sponsor outdated, unnecessary trade shows and offset  marketing/advertising expenses. Equally as quiet all groups say they’re focused on trying to keep pace with their biggest competitor.

Men’s Wearhouse hit a homerun with Vera Wang this season. A new arrangement brings the Calvin Klein brand exclusively to Men’s Wearhouse next year, after the tuxedo business did not (or could not) support the brand. eWedNewz watches as more announcements are made that can help the business– if retailers  realize the power of new, branded products are what customers are looking for– and don’t mind paying for them.

As far as IBISWorld data, eWedNewz got the company to re-visit flawed data given by the research firm to TheStreet.com that said Men’s Wearhouse rented one out of two tuxedos in the United States at the time of the story release in May, 2011.

 What do you think? Are tuxedo rentals back? Were they ever gone? Or are they ready to be buried?

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2013

The Week of May 7th in Review

 

 

 

By Paul Pannone

Celebrity Planner, Samantha Goldberg, is not the only critic of Wedding Wire; not by a long-shot.  Growing concerns over the website’s rating system from vendors fill chat and message board forums. Behind the pleasantries of a recent event, eWedNewz has learned of countermeasures by vendors combining to bring greater awareness and changes at Wedding Wire. eWedNewz coverage of the current events lifted a 2011 story from the archives that became of interest to readers. Our investigation and coverage of the story continues.

Updates to style and fit helps a new generation rediscover suits and tuxedos. The changes are led by Men’s Wearhouse that owns a significant portion of the business.

 

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

 

 

 

 

Not Your Father’s Suit– or Tuxedo

By Paul Pannone

It’s silly to say or even think about this topic but who wants to wear their father’s anything? But that is what’s happening in stores where older (thinking) business people inflict their own person opinions on consumers that wander into their stores– mostly by chance.

An ongoing eWedNewz investigation into why today’s businesses are struggling and losing ground to Big-box operators points back to narrow-minded thoughts that won’t let go of the past or telling a consumer what they should do.

 

Bloggers are bashing the old look of rented tuxedos and taking notice of slim-cut fits. Then everyone wonders why Vera Wang tuxedos are trending in eWedNewz searches.

 

We’re watching Men’s Wearhouse slowly but surely conquer the rest of the tuxedo business because of such actions. Portions of the fragmented business still lament about mundane items like a bow tie or personal preferences of a shawl lapel over a peak or notch– while the fabrics or companies they choose to do business with are decades old. Many don’t even buy current styles or update the fit but continue to rent 10, 20 or even 30 year-old styles.

Smelling blood, Men’s Wearhouse steps out of the old rag business to freshen up their image and attract a younger consumer with updated products and a new pitch. They still guarantee it but this time, the promise is to a new generation, not the old farty one that refuses to let go.

eWedNewz has learned of similar changes at the manufacturing level that plans to leave the old ways and create new products and systems that appeal to consumers– not placate to buyer opinions that don’t place orders anyway.

 

What do you say?

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

Little Guys Pissed Over Big-Box Growth and Promotion

 

By Paul Pannone

An ongoing story involving the takeover of America splinters off into many paths, as confused Citizens of the United States– some of which are good people in business, not good business people– cry foul over many aspects of reality.   Average consumers and businesses feel they’re being squeezed out in favor of Big-box stores;  incensed by suppliers that run to them. The facts are sad, but they’re true.

According to About.com small business — firms with fewer than 500 employees — drives the U.S. economy by providing jobs for over half of the nation’s private workforce. According to a quote in their story;

“Small business drives the American economy,” said Dr. Chad Moutray, Chief Economist for the Office of Advocacy in a press release. “Main Street provides the jobs and spurs our economic growth. American entrepreneurs are creative and productive, and these numbers prove it.”

All true; small business owners are creative, tenacious, innovative, even cunning. But the reality is, most do not have the basic 101 skills to run successful businesses. You can re-read this statement as many times as you like; it won’t change the facts.

eWedNewz investigates why this is so and finds most business owners are driven by emotion, love for the product and see their business as an enemy to their lives, not a part of their life. Through the economic downturn that started in 2008, many have closed their business, replaced by people who lost their job and now see how difficult it is to be a business owner.

eWedNewz coverage of the China issues shows the disconnect of what Americans say and what they really do. A current poll shows only 16% of respondents so far say it doesn’t matter– or they don’t care– where products are produced, leaving 84% saying they do care and would support American products if they were competitively priced. If the poll was 100% reversed it would still show Americans feel the effect of offshore production and the slow but steady loss of American clout and prestige that affects us all. Yet Americans continue to buy products made elsewhere, spending less for the items but many are finding they’ve sacrificed a greater percentage of value, while putting American companies– and workers– out of business.

What you’ve so-far read is background to the real point of this story. In both their personal and business life, most Americans say one thing and do another. For this story we’ll focus on business decisions that should be universally standard across all channels but are not. With the affordability and ubiquitous availability of software, digital, social media, etc., most businesses stay stuck in neutral, letting competitors– especially Big-box operators– take market-share away from them, leading to eroded profit and exhausted patience.

Public exchange of some of the frustration is shown from eWedNewz stories that feature a divide between manufacturers and retailers that should be partnering together, instead of fighting each other. eWedNewz watches all sectors of business politely listening to laments and excuses of why small stores cannot compete. The conclusion; save for true market leading independent stores, the stay local campaign will face major challenges in the near future.

In the flower business websites like flowercomplaint.com urges the use of local shops. But support for convenience, brand recognition and decades of service, consumers still use the FTD network. If you watch and read what the complaint says, which way would you go? Do the names Home Depot and Wal-Mart mean anything? The very existence of Big-box stores named is contradictory to the high demand for service and quality American consumers ask for– but really comes down to the price they’re willing to pay.

In the dress business David’s Bridal is everyone’s enemy; anyone that makes or sells wedding dresses. Chat rooms and message boards are filled with horror stories– but so are complaints against little stores. Check the court docket; they’re filled with consumer cases– big and small.

According to sources the nation and the world are undergoing enormous change. But the desire for respect, value, expectation for and excellent experience never changes. However, human nature goes against the grain of business; big business. In the new order manufacturer say they’re tired of the overhead of dealing with smaller stores and look for one thing: the order.

Sources say Big-box stores can order goods fast and sell them even them faster. In a numbers game (that’s all it is) Big-box stores and manufacturers that can produce large sums of product somehow find each other. Big orders requires huge, up-front commitments on the part of the manufacturer. But as big business goes, from the moment they complete a deal they’re looking for someone cheaper, faster and able to deliver a better product; they only stick with each other because they cannot be replaced.

Several recent eWedNewz stories involving piracy and the success of larger operations struck a nerve, generating mostly private response. We’ll share one case for each story.

Christina DiBlase, owner of A. Bridal Co. & formal in New Jersey gave her opinion of what can be done to help the problems involving Chinese piracy. In response to the story, Jim Duhe responded:

“If manufacturers deleted all design images from their web sites and discontinued all advertising, their fate would be entirely in the hands of independent bridal retailers.  Unfortunately, most retailers aren’t nearly sophisticated enough to compete with big box stores or the brand name recognition of J.Crew, BHLDN, Nicole Miller, Bebe, and an ever growing number of national entities that are gaining prominence in the bridal marketplace.  The solution to Chinese  knock-offs may not be insurmountable but it certainly isn’t as simple as Christine DiBlase suspects.”

In repsonse to the comment, DiBlase fired back;

“Well, well I saw the article today and I guess good ol’ Jim Duhe thinks I’m a simpleton. I don’t see him offering a better solution. Wonder how’d he fix it. Apparently, we retailers are all so unsophisticated when it comes to advertising and branding that God only knows how we have survived so long in this economy. Our methods would most certainly be the demise of all those vendor who know so much more than us.”

Duhe’s turn:

“If retailers had a clue about marketing, they wouldn’t have paved the way for big box stores to walk off with more than 1/3 of all bridal gown sales in the country.  If bridal retailers had even a little marketing savvy, they would have developed multi-media ad campaigns that promote the benefits of shopping at an independent bridal salon.  Instead, the vast majority select not to advertise.  Brilliant.   I’m not saying that all bridal retailers are unsophisticated fools.  In fact, there are some brilliant retailers in the business.  However, as a group, they lack leadership and direction to address any problem that is industry-wide.  There has never been a successful national organization of  bridal retailers in America — EVER.

When big box stores began opening stores throughout the country, bridal retailers selected to move across town rather than maintain a location next to this new competitor.  The net result . . . most of the stores who moved away to escape the taint of David’s went out of business. Those who were “stuck” with locations near big box stores prospered.  Gee.  I wonder why?

When big box retailers began advertising in print, independent retailers decided that they wouldn’t advertise in any magazines that accepted big box store ads.  The net result . . . big box stores grew more quickly business of advertising exclusivity.  Brilliant move.

When the internet began to gain prominence, bridal retailers thought that their marketing problems were solved.  They believed that email blasts were the answer.  They believed that The Knot was the answer.  They believed that Wedding Wire was the answer.  The vast majority are willing to latch on to anything except logic to solve their problems.

Expecting the manufacturers to leave marketing is unrealistic and naive at best.  Don’t take my word for it.  Ask any manufacturer of any product with national distribution if this seems like a rational suggestion.  Do you think that Flow would select not to promote or advertise products on a web site?”

Duhe and other members of the Wedding Water Cooler mention FLOW and has consistently commented and applauded the formal wear manufacturer’s decision to break out of a mold (moldy) format that has not worked for decades. Onlookers that don’t understand basic business 101 passed on new programs and marketing ideas and found themselves  out of luck.

Not everyone sees it that way.

“Yes, by all means lets continue to send men to MW Tux…the store that treats the customer like cattle and charges them highway robbery prices to do it. There are however some brides who are wising up and seeking alternatives. Small local stores and chains can offer better prices, service and selection.

The new styles are falling short to deliver on all this grandiose marketing is claiming. I rented a Tony Bowls to a young man for prom this past week. I charged him the going rate “based” off all the hype and the slim fitted look. Just as MW tux would do for the Vera Wang items. The tux did not deliver one bit on its look and hype…it was so bad that the mother paid $75 more to have an old After Six La Strada shipped in! (only reason I did not give her a refund or cover the cost is the fact I advised her against renting the Tony Bowls.)

Marketing is good for any industry, but keep in mind it must be kept as honest as possible…fitted or slim fit rentals are a pipe dream. That is why they are rentals, if you want fitted try and convince your customer to buy the tuxedo and have it tailored as needed. Don’t over promise then under-deliver,” according to Stephen D. Schaffer, proprietor.

 

The owner of  tux2u.com charged $75 more to have an old After Six La Strada shipped in; another verification why tuxedo stores are losing credibility, renting old garments made over a decade ago. Please visit www.tux2u.com they have a good choice of cigars; and their watches aren’t bad either.

We won’t waste your time with more of Mr. Schaffer’s assertions; laughably about censorship. If you’re interested, you can see it here.

“That’s what’s wrong with a lot of the smaller operators that don’t get the bigger picture. They’re too stuck in running their store to update websites, get into Social Media and do all the things their competitors are doing right. Then they sit and cry about how bad business is,” says Christine Boulton, business adviser and creator of the Wedding Water Cooler.

 

What do you say? We promise not to censor you.

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

The Tuxedo Business Gets a Boost from Vera Wang and Tony Bowls; What a Situation

By Paul Pannone

2012 will be remembered as the year tuxedos were reinvented– not by the narrow-minded People of the Tux– but by women dress makers and a TV personality. After years of decline the sale and use of tuxedos are on an upswing, attracting foreign manufacturers and other interested investors that hear the buzz and look to capitalize on the resurgence.

Updated fit, new fabrics and stylish innovation get the credit for the upswing, led by manufacturers that use their tailored suit division intelligence and are able to quickly update silhouettes for a consumer no longer willing to wear his father’s tuxedo.

 

According to Google searches for the term “tuxedos” and related terms have been in decline since 2006. But current related tuxedo searches are up significantly at this time of year.

 

Internet searches hitting eWedNewz stories about tuxedos continue to grow in peak demand times. Searches for Vera Wang tuxedos are gathering attention, fueled by gown sales at David’s Bridal. Brides that buy Vera Wang dresses are directed to Men’s Wearhouse for the formal wear– a natural choice.

The popular Tony Bowls dress brand was used by Jim’s formal wear to create a Tony Bowls tuxedo that also sold well and is renting for prom. Again driven by dress sales, the emotional connection is a natural transfer from female to male escort.

The tuxedo talk of the season came from the Jersey Shore TV celebrity, the Situation, who promoted the line. Sources like TMZ, MTV, MSNBC and countless other news sources created a media event for the line. The orders and production for the number one new tuxedo for 2012, the Avalon, was cutoff, creating an even higher demand for the product.

So what do all these new tuxedo brands have in common? The same people who make Calvin Klein, Ralph Lauren, Joseph Abboud and other retail brands– FLOW Formalmake the garments for Vera Wang, Tony Bowls and the Situation.

Fashion sources say they’re not surprised at the growing buzz for tuxedo use. Expert, Jim Duhe, told eWedNewz;

“Interest in Vera Wang tuxedos is growing.  Why? Was there some type of divine intervention?  Did an arch angel come down from the sky and suggest that people should search the internet for Vera Wang tuxedos?  Did the compulsion to search for Vera Wang Tuxedos come to people in dream form?

Maybe you’ve noticed that Vera Wang tuxedo ads now are included in all major national bridal publications.  The campaign is  modest — spreads in each issue.   No retail locations are specified on the ad.  However, readers are directed to go to the Men’s Wearhouse web site.  Interesting.”

The rise in interest for tuxedos sparks interest from manufacturing and licensing organizations that want to get into the tuxedo business but admit they know very little of where to begin. Most don’t realize the cost involved and quickly back away when they find out what is involved.

 

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

Searches for Vera Wang Tuxedos On the Rise, on the Net

 

By Paul Pannone

The rise in interest for Vera Wang tuxedos should come as no surprise to anyone. Two powerhouse names combined last year to form the alliance and immediately soared. Since they announced the collaboration between Vera Wang and Men’s Wearhouse in December, 2011, interest continues to grow resulting in the current rise in search results by consumers wanting to know more about the product.

 

A story by MTV had them eating crow– just a bit– as tuxedos continue to gain acceptance.

 

An eWedNewz poll shows 57% of respondents feel Vera Wang tuxedos will be successful with 38% disagreeing.

What do you think?

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

FLOW Formal Tapped to Manufacture Products for Two Big deals

 

By Paul Pannone

The two biggest buyers of formal wear business selected FLOW Formal to manufacture private label programs with top fashion gown manufacturers, Vera Wang and Tony Bowls. The  two separate licensing arrangement between Vera Wang, Men’s Wearhouse and Tony Bowls, Jim’s Formalwear required a manufacture with the wherewithal and financial ability to produce and deliver massive quantities of products in a very tight delivery window.

eWedNewz discovered FLOW Formal is one of the few suppliers that could handle the deals because of their worldwide production and strong financial ability to offer the upfront cost of materials, labor and shipping requirements.

 

eWedNewz watches FLOW’s continued to grow in the diminishing formal wear business, supplying formal wear under the Calvin Klein, Ralph Lauren and Joseph Abboud labels to the open-market trade.

 

 

The shift from generic, fictitious products towards recognized, better branded goods is what prompted the licensing deals, raising the ceiling on margins for store owners that have not kept up with updating merchandise in the wake of a faltering economy.

In 2010 the tuxedo manufacturer diversified its lineup of products, launching innovative styling under the TV Celebrity endorsement of “The Situation”. The collaboration leverages millions of his followers on television and online, now aware of FLOW manufactured products bearing his name.

The company continues to offer tuxedo basics under their Lord West brand, acquired when Formal One merged with Lord West in 2006 to form “Formal Lord One West”, aka, FLOW. The merger continues to offer better formal wear retailers in the tuxedo trade with quality products under world-class names.

FLOW continues to refine its systems, investing a significant amount of resources to better manufacturing, production and promotion of men’s rental and retail tuxedos and accessories. A growing presence on the internet includes social media and a planned re-launch of their company website, www.tuxedos.com , slated for early spring, 2012.

The owner and management at FLOW declined to comment on the specifics of the deal.

eWedNewz continues our coverage of the early 2012 launch and success of both deals.

 

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2011

The Week of December 12th in Review; Martha Stewart bails out on Wedding Wire

 

By Paul Pannone

 

In a usually slow time of the year the week of December 12th, 2011 goes down as one of the more active weeks of the year. Two major deal announcements involving tuxedo rentals within 24 hours of each other were overthrown as the week’s top story by a Celebrity throwing a major digital company under the bus. Again, within 24 hours of the story’s release a major stock position in the company was sold to investors.

Samantha Goldberg exposed Wedding Wire and other online wedding directory listing services for practices that could prove illegal. Goldberg, trashed by a bride on Wedding Wire, returned the favor– plus interest. Goldberg threw Wedding Wire’s practices under the bus and garnered growing support from wedding industry members coming forth with similar stories.

 

Martha Stewart dumps Wedding Wire and raises millions for her struggling company.

 

Ironically the story gets more interesting as Martha Stewart volleyed their shares of Wedding Wire to Catalyst investors, an aggressive private equity firm.

In a press release by Martha Stewart the follow is said;

“As part of the investment agreement, MSLO and WeddingWire signed a commercial agreement through which WeddingWire will offer its proprietary tools on the Weddings section of marthastewart.com, allowing users ready access to a vast network of local vendors and online wedding-planning tools. MSLO may also integrate similar tools using WeddingWire’s technology across its other content verticals. WeddingWire’s main web property, www.weddingwire.com, will receive Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia content, which will include integrated links to drive traffic to marthastewart.com. In addition, WeddingWire has designated MSLO as its exclusive national advertising sales force for the duration of the agreement, and the two companies will share the advertising revenues sold on the site.”

 

The strong press release still shows faith in Wedding Wire, keeping a working relationship alive but Martha Stewart went for the money and dumped their major stake in the company– about 8 million shares– and garnered over $7 million dollars. Martha Stewart Living bought a 40 percent stake of Wedding Wire in 2008 but looks to restructure its business  in a difficult economy.

In a wave of strategic partnering and consolidation identified by this newZ source earlier this year Men’s Wearhouse and Vera Wang teamed up in the men’s formal wear category to create a high-end rental.

Similarly, Mon Cheri and Jim’s formal wear have also teamed up to create tuxedos by Tony Bowls. In both deals the tuxedos will be manufactured by FLOW Formal.

 

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2011

Men’s Wearhouse and Vera Wang Teaming Up with Tuxedos Shouldn’t Come as a Surprise

 

By Paul Pannone

 

Revered wedding gown designer, Vera Wang, continues her move into other products and market areas, expanding her business in a tough economic environment. Since announcing a deal with David’s Bridal Wang’s influence on the dress business continues to grow. But in a shrinking wedding market Wang’s strategic move into other areas and becoming more affordable makes perfect sense.

 

Vera Wang’s influence has now reached the men’s formal wear category.

 

Vera Wang and Men’s Wearhouse are now partners in the men’s formal wear category. The move should come as no surprise; the David’s Bridal and Men’s Wearhouse love affair dates back to 2006 when Federated Department Stores agreed to sell its Bridal Group division in two separate transactions. Leonard Green & Partners of Los Angeles reportedly paid about $750 million for the 269-store David’s Bridal and 10-store Priscilla of Boston stores.

Men’s Wearhouse took over the 511-store After Hours Formal wear business for a reported $100 million-dollars but the two continued to work together sharing leads and cross promoting their business to the same bride. David’s Bridal has been pushing brides through MW doors for years;

Is your heart set on a totally integrated color scheme? David’s Bridal and Men’s Wearhouse, our tux rental partner make it easy to pull together your whole wedding with our exclusive color-coordinated bridal party dresses and tuxedo accents. Take even more guesswork out of creating a perfect match with our coordinated invitations and exclusive ceremony collections. Find the perfect accents for your wedding theme: an array of personalized invitations, thank you notes, attendant’s gifts, wedding day essentials, and so much more.

David’s Bridal recently entered the photography business in an added effort to extrapolate as many budget dollars from the same bride as possible. David’s Bridal continues to refine and hone their business leveraging low, medium and higher cost goods in their core dress business and redirect the traffic to partner relationships in their network.

Priscilla of Boston stores are due to close by the end of 2011, killed in part by the success of Vera Wang’s higher ticket prices in David’s Bridal stores. Sources that did not wish to be identified earlier this year said Vera Wang products were outselling comparable products in Priscilla of Boston stores “four-to-one” and was a leading cause in the decision to dump the Priscilla business and overhead that went along with it. Sources told eWedNewz cost cutting and better deployment of resources is an ongoing process at David’s– always looking to the bottom line.

Reaction  to the MW and VW deal has so far been mixed, as traditional tuxedo companies say men won’t wear a woman’s label. But from a marketing view brides are still the primary decision makers and will want coordinating Vera Wang tuxedos with their gowns.

 

What do you think? Will Vera Wang tuxedos rock?

 

 

 

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2011

Calvin Klein, Ralph Lauren prop up Tuxedo Rentals

By Paul Pannone

The decline of formal weddings has taken the use of tuxedos to new lows in 2008 and 2009 causing the failure of several formal wear suppliers including the largest, After Six, leaving three suppliers: FLOW, Fabian Couture and Formal Wear International. But with the faster decline in consumer demand sources still say there is an overage of supply.

Recently tuxedos– an updated version– that depart from the traditional, are causing a stir, attracting attention of consumers. But the stir and what appeals to a segment of the consumer market leaves a traditional segment of the tuxedo business unhappy. It’s the segment that wants business to return to the glory days when a basic black tuxedo, a white pleated wing-collar shirt, bow tie and a vest allowed store owners to charge $150 dollars a rental.

The golden goose went on week after week, month after month, year after year for decades. An eWedNewz investigation shows some of the remaining companies are still renting tuxedo units they bought in the 1990′s– and even the 1980′s.

Names like After Six, Claiborne, Christian Dior, Raffinatti, Henry Grethal and the worst we’ve seen, Pierre Cardin? offer little or no value to the consumer. Outdated fit, incorrect lapel sizes besides unsanitary reasons give tuxedo rentals a bad reputation. By the way, Pierre Cardin tuxedos are from the 1980′s.

So what tuxedo brands are fresh, current and renting? fictitious names like Jean Yves are widely distributed, along with “B” labels like Perry Ellis. Most rent for about $125-150 dollars, depending on the area, and are perfectly fine. For about the same price names like Calvin Klein and Ralph Lauren are widely available only at better men’s formal wear specialists. But what if brands like Calvin Klein and Ralph Lauren no longer existed?

 

The 2012 Calvin Klein Sire is getting the greatest attention by consumers online.

 

Discussions with formal wear specialists say the most often “turned” brands in their stores are either Ralph Lauren or Calvin Klein. In major metropolitan areas turn percentages of over 40% are reported, dominated by the brands that are easily identified by consumers.

eWedNewz has learned the brands are vital to major retailers like Men’s Wearhouse that dominate the rental market, holding 33% of all the tuxedos rented in the US. An ongoing investigation as to why the Men’s Wearhouse rental division continues to grow shows the proper leveraging of better branded products like Ralph Lauren and Calvin Klein. Men’s Wearhouse capitalizes on their own marketing and advertising but adds the built-in brand awareness of the world-class names.

Beside the consumer brand recognition, superior fit and fabrics used in the manufacturing of the garments surpass the scratchy wool used in no-name and fictitious branded goods.

eWedNewz is watching the quiet boycott of the branded goods by operators could be coming to an end. Since 2003, many shied away from manufacturers that sold goods to Men’s Wearhouse but discovered they shot themselves in the foot, leaving the door wide open for Men’s Wearhouse and other competitors that embraced the brands.

In the eWNz investigation we’ve found the companies that carry old merchandise– Pierre Cardin?– have struggled to survive; most have disappeared. Those that are hanging on by a thread have stopped buying new goods or resist the demand of consumers and substitute inferior products.

Companies that caught on and included true brands like Calvin Klein and Ralph Lauren say they’re able to raise average ticket prices from 5-15% on each rental– far outpacing the additional cost of the garment.

What is your opinion? Please post it here or contact Paul@ewednewz.com or 516-312-0090.

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2011