Chinese Get more Aggressive while American Gown Makers Look on

By Paul Pannone

On the first anniversary of an unprecedented meeting in New York the American Bridal and Prom Industry Association convened members of the wedding media to update them on the progress of efforts to slow down the rampant piracy of American goods and conceptual property. Members of the ABPIA board gave the gathering a realistic assessment of the current status saying the campaign enters another phase of an expected long, arduous process.

Bob Cahoon of Maggie Sottero gave the media gathering in New York his honest assessment of a very difficult situation. Steve Lang looks on.

Steve Lang took his usual place at the start of the meeting but yielded midway to Bob Cahoon, president of Maggie Sottero and board member. Cahoon reiterated what Lang has been telling eWedNewz and the wedding industry for over a year staying consistent with the message. Both Cahoon and Lang went beyond the usual rundown of what’s been done so far and stressed how the battle becomes more difficult with each win.

“They’re not going to just sit still and allow us to gain any ground; to the contrary they’re becoming more aggressive and tenacious in their efforts, ” Lang told eWedNewz.

According to Lang the battles won so-far were only preliminaries of what is to come. The illegal use of imaging and explaining how it hurts manufacturers is a difficult legal battle. Now the greater use of technology changing the face of models, creating an entirely different image, makes convincing a judge of a crime more difficult.

Exuberance of a year ago turned serious this time around, as Lang and the ABPIA fight an uphill battle for support from an industry whose nation is under siege. Lang cited a  New York Times story of how the middlemen and layers of overhead are being stripped away from the chain supply of manufactured goods. Lang and Cahoon admitted retailers are part of the traditional structure and conduit between their products and consumers. But rising cost of operation inflates prices  and is forcing some stores, including Vera Wang, to figure out how to stay competitive while boosting revenue.

“We know all the challenges that exist; they’re not going to go away. All we can do is adjust our businesses to the realities that are out there. The best we can hope for is to slow down the deterioration that is taking place,” Lang told the gathering.

An ongoing poll shows 71% of combined replies so-far think the chances of beating online piracy are fair-to-excellent. 26% of combined replies say chances are poor-to-impossible.

 

Only 5% of current replies say they would not join an industry organization. An overwhelming majority say they would support an organization that was well-run, offered good benefits and was not too expensive to join.

 

An appeal to the gathered media to spread the word about the organization was reinforced by board members. Cahoon told the members of the media he keeps track of the perception of the organization’s effort by having Maggie Sottero sales people ask accounts what they think. The results of the surveys were not clear or available for review, but Cahoon mentioned the $100 dollar membership fee was sometimes an issue.

On his own, Lang brought up plans to provide affordable healthcare to the broader  wedding industry beyond dresses. But while poll results so-far show a strong sign of support, actual membership does not show the results.

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2013

The Week of March 25th in Review

By Paul Pannone

Vera Wang made top newZ this week getting U.S retailers hot and bothered over the prospect of charging brides to try on merchandise and fitting-room shopping time. But, as quick as it came, the Vera Wang organization scrapped the policy, succumbing to internet pressure and bad PR created by the move.

Celebrity wedding planner, Samantha Goldberg, issued a Press release announcing a long-awaited and talked about show . Goldberg made her rounds publicizing the show and has already started calling out organizations and people she alleges are misleading people and pocketing the profits. eWedNewz investigates further.

 

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2013

 

 

 

Vera Wang Scraps $500 dollar Try-on Charge

By Paul Pannone

Because of a global outcry, Vera Wang has scrapped plans to charge Chinese shoppers a $500 fee. A Day after eWedNewz covered the story about Vera Wang charging the fee and negative global media coverage about their Shanghai store, a Vera Wang spokeswoman announced the charge was being scrapped as of today.

Fitting rooms are still free at Vera Wang and most bridal boutiques for now; but for how long?

 

“Please kindly be informed that Vera Wang has abolished appointment fees at her bridal salons worldwide starting from March 27, 2013,” the spokeswoman said in an email to the Reuters news agency, without elaborating.

The Wang organization claimed the fee was imposed to curtail some of the copying taking place. Their PR department also reported limited knowledge of the fee but quickly shuttered the plan as criticism grew along with media coverage.

Whatever the true reason, the prospect of Vera Wang’s policy sticking was music to the ears of retailers and some manufacturers we spoke with. Most say the Internet has disrupted their business, increasing meaningless store traffic, creating overhead and more cost to accommodate shoppers who want to physically see the merchandise, obtain SKU numbers and style information and then make their buy online for less money. But the rise of knock-off merchandise continues to plague the wedding dress business.

In 2012, China was the top source country for counterfeit goods entering the United States and the European Union (EU) with more than 70 percent originating from China, according to the latest customs seizure reports from the U.S. and the EU. According to the Counterfeiting Intelligence Bureau (CIB) of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), counterfeit goods make up 5 to 7% of world trade.

Currently, Steve Lang, owner on Mon Cheri, is embroiled in a battle to offset knock-off and online piracy. Lang’s effort includes forming an organization called the ABPIA that is gathering support in and out of the wedding dress business.

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2013

 

Vera Wang Chinese Try-on Policy Gets American Retailers Excited

By Paul Pannone

Vera Wang is making headlines again but this time not with a new dress design but for the honor to try a dress on. According to reports brides-to-be (in China) are being charged almost $500 dollars for an hour and a half appointment to try on Vera Wang merchandise. The fee gets deducted from the price of the dress– if they buy– otherwise the money is forfeited.

We wonder if stars like Angelina Jolie get charged to simply try on a dress before the actual sale. Or do they get paid for mock-up publicity?

 

Reports say the company is trying to keep from getting knocked off, protecting its brand and designs, much like American manufacturers who’re in a fight for survival against dress piracy in China. It’s unknown whether the Vera Wang company is serious about supporting the fight that was recently backed up by a New Jersey judge or if times are just tight for everyone, including the Vera Wang company.

So far the practice has not hit the United States but sources say Vera Wang is watching the PR and backlash. Last year Dolce & Gabbana drew criticism on Social Networks for disallowing picture-taking by Hong Kong natives but not tourists. The unclear guideline raised some issues that no company can afford these days with the rise and instant reprisal brought on by bad publicity over the internet.

In the United States, eWedNewz bridal sources say they’re thrilled at Vera Wang’s attempt to charge consumers to try on merchandise. Facebook responses included store owners who feel they’re losing sales to online dress companies who undercut their prices.

“Bridal Salon professionals spend a lot of time giving “professional advice” what is in style, how to accessories, negotiate, all these girls, not all, but the majority all they want to do is “showroom” your salon, take pictures, and won’t commit to buy, and they have already tried on 50+ gowns. You mean to tell me a gal can’t walk into a beautiful Bridal salon with boutique quality gowns( not you know who)and can’t find anything in their budget?? This is nonsense, because every store has gowns that should be falling off the racks in sales every day!!! Price…it is what it is…you can’t expect to buy St. Pucchi for $1000 including the veil,” said one retailer.

Similar thoughts given by all responding store retailers shows the deep frustration they feel towards the internet and how it’s affected their operation and ability to charge the needed mark-up to stay in business.

The discussion spilled over into the Wedding Water Cooler where we omitted statements from retailers in the group but focused on those given by sources not in the retail end of the business.

“A few bridal retailers in the US have instituted try-on fees in the past.  However, I’m not aware of any fee that’s as high as the fee that Vera is charging.  The retailer applies the try-on fee toward any merchandise purchased in the store.  It’s a practical and logical policy for name brand retailers.  I could be wrong about this but I believe that Kleinfeld’s has a try-on fee.   It prevents show rooming for internet sites.  In the long run, it may be the only thing that will prevent consumers from going to a retailer to try on a gown that they plan to purchase online.  I doubt that this policy will fly in small markets but I can see the benefit it provides:  it separates the lookers from the buyers; it allows the retailer to concentrate efforts on consumers who definitely will purchase at the store,” according to one WWC member.

Kleinfeld told eWedNewz they do not charge to try on their gowns but do take credit-card and other personal information to book the appointment. But, according to Kleinfeld in New York City, no money is charged to try on their merchandise and there is no obligation to buy from them. It clearly states on their website, picture taking is not allowed during the shopping appointment.

May I take pictures of the gowns while I try them on?

“We do not allow cameras in the fitting rooms while you are shopping. Once you have purchased a dress, you may take as many pictures as you’d like.”

 

eWedNewz will continue to follow this story. We ask for your thoughts and opinion.

 

 

 eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2013

Popular Brands compared to Unknown Names

By Paul Pannone

Growing pressure caused by challenging economic conditions force consumers who are trying to make ends meet to buy merchandise at lower prices. But when is a bargain not a bargain?

In an eWedNewz investigation experts warn about merchandise with little or no salable market. In the past consumers were less informed of materials and manufacturing methods. Today with the help of Social Media the word quickly spreads on products and services that do not meet the ever-growing demand of consumers.

“Basically, you want to buy only desirable merchandise. Some times merchandise shows up with closeout dealers because it wouldn’t sell in a store,” according to one expert.

Others agree saying as the notoriety of a brand name increases so does the standard of quality demands for fit, construction and overall performance expectations. But with the faltering economy the line of distinction between a world-class brand recognized by consumers and made-up, fictitious names can be easily mistaken by buyers who think they’re saving money when ordering merchandise.

Unknown brands use cheaper pricing to build their business while true brands leverage image and consumer demand to command higher pricing and higher margins for retailers, while delivering sustained quality assurance and value to consumers. It’s important to remember products bearing the name of a recognized brand known for quality in a variety of item translates into higher pricing power and ongoing ability to perform to everyone’s expectations.

According to Ask.Reference.com Brand is often the company name or logo referenced for a specific business. “Branding” is when their name, logo or company specific identifiers are strategically placed to better market their brand to the consuming public.

Vera Wang tops other more-established tuxedo names but remains behind tuxedos bearing higher world-class branded recognition.

 

In today’s difficult economy even recognized brand names are forced to become affordable to compete with the growing choices offered to consumers. Such was the reason Vera Wang expanded her base of consumers by collaborating with David’s Bridal, creating a more affordable product but becoming the most expensive line at David’s. Strategically the Wang line became mainstream while lifting David’s pricing ability to a wider consumer base.

The Vera Wang organization followed-up by expanding into the men’s tuxedo business, collaborating with Men’s Wearhouse, creating style and demand in a yet another strategic alliance. Searches for Vera Wang tuxedos blew past established names in the formal wear business.

In our ongoing investigation into this story eWedNewz learned that the greater demand and brand recognition the higher the risk of being imitated, copied and tampered with. In the case of Giorgio Armani the probability of being copied bears the greatest risk of creating excellent designs. Descriptions and accounts of fake Armani products concludes  imitation really is the sincerest form of flattery; we haven’t found many accounts of pirates copying styles or products that nobody wants.

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

Clayton, Dubilier & Rice reportedly agrees to pay $900 million for David’s Bridal

 

By Paul Pannone

Since eWedNewz discovered David’s Bridal was on the auction block in June owners have been quietly seeking a buyer that still has confidence in a sagging wedding industry. The challenge may be met, as Leonard Green & Partners hands off the hot-potato dress company to private-equity firm Clayton, Dubilier & Rice for a price around $900 million. Green paid $750 million in 2007; a 16.6% increase if the deal closes– and a 3.4% average return over the last five years– way below private equity expectation and standards.

Clayton, Dublier & Rice feel they can top the paltry 3.4% average return in company value realized by Leonard Green & Partners.

 

Sources familiar with the story say they’re amazed CDR would get into the wedding business at a time of economic challenges and an aversion towards marriage.

63% of an ongoing poll says Leonard Green is smart in dumping David’s, while 22% say it remains to be seen. 12% feel Leonard is making a mistake in selling; 3% give their feelings of the troubles at David’s Bridal ranging from poor customer service to inferior quality of merchandise. Many bridal store owners feel the dress business is saturated and under attack by offshore sources selling dresses direct to consumers and undercutting prices.

 

If you have not voted please give us your views.

 

 

eWedNewz continues our investigation and coverage of this story.

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

Tuxedo Rentals are down but Sales are Up

By Paul Pannone

For various reasons including lack of style innovation and a reason for retailers to update inventory, tuxedo rentals have continued to fall out of favor among a new generation of consumers. Adding to the decline are less formal wedding events and greater acceptance of using regular suits by the groom and his ushers.

 

Internet searches for Vera Wang Tuxedos raised awareness for tuxedo rentals in 2012.

 

According to a recent survey from Bridal Guide Magazine only 67.9% of respondents said the groom and men in the wedding party would be wearing tuxedos. Of those, 85% said they would be renting, while 15% said they would buy their formal wear; up significantly from 2009 when other data sources said 8% would buy.

Since 2001 the tuxedo rental business has continued to decline. In 2000 there were four major clothing suppliers, three accessory companies, three shirt companies, three plastic shoe suppliers and over 9,000 retailers. Today there are barely three tuxedo-makers; no significant accessory makers. The industry struggles for shirts and shoes. There are far less true tuxedo specialists left and more departing every year.

In the past 18 months there’s been some style innovation and brand expansion including the use of celebrity followers and recognized dress designer names. eWedNewz is watching several other innovative moves in advertising and marketing to help jump-start interest at the consumer level. We will report the findings later this year.

 

 

What do you say? Take a moment and vote

 

 

 

 eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

 

Not Your Father’s Suit– or Tuxedo

By Paul Pannone

It’s silly to say or even think about this topic but who wants to wear their father’s anything? But that is what’s happening in stores where older (thinking) business people inflict their own person opinions on consumers that wander into their stores– mostly by chance.

An ongoing eWedNewz investigation into why today’s businesses are struggling and losing ground to Big-box operators points back to narrow-minded thoughts that won’t let go of the past or telling a consumer what they should do.

 

Bloggers are bashing the old look of rented tuxedos and taking notice of slim-cut fits. Then everyone wonders why Vera Wang tuxedos are trending in eWedNewz searches.

 

We’re watching Men’s Wearhouse slowly but surely conquer the rest of the tuxedo business because of such actions. Portions of the fragmented business still lament about mundane items like a bow tie or personal preferences of a shawl lapel over a peak or notch– while the fabrics or companies they choose to do business with are decades old. Many don’t even buy current styles or update the fit but continue to rent 10, 20 or even 30 year-old styles.

Smelling blood, Men’s Wearhouse steps out of the old rag business to freshen up their image and attract a younger consumer with updated products and a new pitch. They still guarantee it but this time, the promise is to a new generation, not the old farty one that refuses to let go.

eWedNewz has learned of similar changes at the manufacturing level that plans to leave the old ways and create new products and systems that appeal to consumers– not placate to buyer opinions that don’t place orders anyway.

 

What do you say?

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

Little Guys Pissed Over Big-Box Growth and Promotion

 

By Paul Pannone

An ongoing story involving the takeover of America splinters off into many paths, as confused Citizens of the United States– some of which are good people in business, not good business people– cry foul over many aspects of reality.   Average consumers and businesses feel they’re being squeezed out in favor of Big-box stores;  incensed by suppliers that run to them. The facts are sad, but they’re true.

According to About.com small business — firms with fewer than 500 employees — drives the U.S. economy by providing jobs for over half of the nation’s private workforce. According to a quote in their story;

“Small business drives the American economy,” said Dr. Chad Moutray, Chief Economist for the Office of Advocacy in a press release. “Main Street provides the jobs and spurs our economic growth. American entrepreneurs are creative and productive, and these numbers prove it.”

All true; small business owners are creative, tenacious, innovative, even cunning. But the reality is, most do not have the basic 101 skills to run successful businesses. You can re-read this statement as many times as you like; it won’t change the facts.

eWedNewz investigates why this is so and finds most business owners are driven by emotion, love for the product and see their business as an enemy to their lives, not a part of their life. Through the economic downturn that started in 2008, many have closed their business, replaced by people who lost their job and now see how difficult it is to be a business owner.

eWedNewz coverage of the China issues shows the disconnect of what Americans say and what they really do. A current poll shows only 16% of respondents so far say it doesn’t matter– or they don’t care– where products are produced, leaving 84% saying they do care and would support American products if they were competitively priced. If the poll was 100% reversed it would still show Americans feel the effect of offshore production and the slow but steady loss of American clout and prestige that affects us all. Yet Americans continue to buy products made elsewhere, spending less for the items but many are finding they’ve sacrificed a greater percentage of value, while putting American companies– and workers– out of business.

What you’ve so-far read is background to the real point of this story. In both their personal and business life, most Americans say one thing and do another. For this story we’ll focus on business decisions that should be universally standard across all channels but are not. With the affordability and ubiquitous availability of software, digital, social media, etc., most businesses stay stuck in neutral, letting competitors– especially Big-box operators– take market-share away from them, leading to eroded profit and exhausted patience.

Public exchange of some of the frustration is shown from eWedNewz stories that feature a divide between manufacturers and retailers that should be partnering together, instead of fighting each other. eWedNewz watches all sectors of business politely listening to laments and excuses of why small stores cannot compete. The conclusion; save for true market leading independent stores, the stay local campaign will face major challenges in the near future.

In the flower business websites like flowercomplaint.com urges the use of local shops. But support for convenience, brand recognition and decades of service, consumers still use the FTD network. If you watch and read what the complaint says, which way would you go? Do the names Home Depot and Wal-Mart mean anything? The very existence of Big-box stores named is contradictory to the high demand for service and quality American consumers ask for– but really comes down to the price they’re willing to pay.

In the dress business David’s Bridal is everyone’s enemy; anyone that makes or sells wedding dresses. Chat rooms and message boards are filled with horror stories– but so are complaints against little stores. Check the court docket; they’re filled with consumer cases– big and small.

According to sources the nation and the world are undergoing enormous change. But the desire for respect, value, expectation for and excellent experience never changes. However, human nature goes against the grain of business; big business. In the new order manufacturer say they’re tired of the overhead of dealing with smaller stores and look for one thing: the order.

Sources say Big-box stores can order goods fast and sell them even them faster. In a numbers game (that’s all it is) Big-box stores and manufacturers that can produce large sums of product somehow find each other. Big orders requires huge, up-front commitments on the part of the manufacturer. But as big business goes, from the moment they complete a deal they’re looking for someone cheaper, faster and able to deliver a better product; they only stick with each other because they cannot be replaced.

Several recent eWedNewz stories involving piracy and the success of larger operations struck a nerve, generating mostly private response. We’ll share one case for each story.

Christina DiBlase, owner of A. Bridal Co. & formal in New Jersey gave her opinion of what can be done to help the problems involving Chinese piracy. In response to the story, Jim Duhe responded:

“If manufacturers deleted all design images from their web sites and discontinued all advertising, their fate would be entirely in the hands of independent bridal retailers.  Unfortunately, most retailers aren’t nearly sophisticated enough to compete with big box stores or the brand name recognition of J.Crew, BHLDN, Nicole Miller, Bebe, and an ever growing number of national entities that are gaining prominence in the bridal marketplace.  The solution to Chinese  knock-offs may not be insurmountable but it certainly isn’t as simple as Christine DiBlase suspects.”

In repsonse to the comment, DiBlase fired back;

“Well, well I saw the article today and I guess good ol’ Jim Duhe thinks I’m a simpleton. I don’t see him offering a better solution. Wonder how’d he fix it. Apparently, we retailers are all so unsophisticated when it comes to advertising and branding that God only knows how we have survived so long in this economy. Our methods would most certainly be the demise of all those vendor who know so much more than us.”

Duhe’s turn:

“If retailers had a clue about marketing, they wouldn’t have paved the way for big box stores to walk off with more than 1/3 of all bridal gown sales in the country.  If bridal retailers had even a little marketing savvy, they would have developed multi-media ad campaigns that promote the benefits of shopping at an independent bridal salon.  Instead, the vast majority select not to advertise.  Brilliant.   I’m not saying that all bridal retailers are unsophisticated fools.  In fact, there are some brilliant retailers in the business.  However, as a group, they lack leadership and direction to address any problem that is industry-wide.  There has never been a successful national organization of  bridal retailers in America — EVER.

When big box stores began opening stores throughout the country, bridal retailers selected to move across town rather than maintain a location next to this new competitor.  The net result . . . most of the stores who moved away to escape the taint of David’s went out of business. Those who were “stuck” with locations near big box stores prospered.  Gee.  I wonder why?

When big box retailers began advertising in print, independent retailers decided that they wouldn’t advertise in any magazines that accepted big box store ads.  The net result . . . big box stores grew more quickly business of advertising exclusivity.  Brilliant move.

When the internet began to gain prominence, bridal retailers thought that their marketing problems were solved.  They believed that email blasts were the answer.  They believed that The Knot was the answer.  They believed that Wedding Wire was the answer.  The vast majority are willing to latch on to anything except logic to solve their problems.

Expecting the manufacturers to leave marketing is unrealistic and naive at best.  Don’t take my word for it.  Ask any manufacturer of any product with national distribution if this seems like a rational suggestion.  Do you think that Flow would select not to promote or advertise products on a web site?”

Duhe and other members of the Wedding Water Cooler mention FLOW and has consistently commented and applauded the formal wear manufacturer’s decision to break out of a mold (moldy) format that has not worked for decades. Onlookers that don’t understand basic business 101 passed on new programs and marketing ideas and found themselves  out of luck.

Not everyone sees it that way.

“Yes, by all means lets continue to send men to MW Tux…the store that treats the customer like cattle and charges them highway robbery prices to do it. There are however some brides who are wising up and seeking alternatives. Small local stores and chains can offer better prices, service and selection.

The new styles are falling short to deliver on all this grandiose marketing is claiming. I rented a Tony Bowls to a young man for prom this past week. I charged him the going rate “based” off all the hype and the slim fitted look. Just as MW tux would do for the Vera Wang items. The tux did not deliver one bit on its look and hype…it was so bad that the mother paid $75 more to have an old After Six La Strada shipped in! (only reason I did not give her a refund or cover the cost is the fact I advised her against renting the Tony Bowls.)

Marketing is good for any industry, but keep in mind it must be kept as honest as possible…fitted or slim fit rentals are a pipe dream. That is why they are rentals, if you want fitted try and convince your customer to buy the tuxedo and have it tailored as needed. Don’t over promise then under-deliver,” according to Stephen D. Schaffer, proprietor.

 

The owner of  tux2u.com charged $75 more to have an old After Six La Strada shipped in; another verification why tuxedo stores are losing credibility, renting old garments made over a decade ago. Please visit www.tux2u.com they have a good choice of cigars; and their watches aren’t bad either.

We won’t waste your time with more of Mr. Schaffer’s assertions; laughably about censorship. If you’re interested, you can see it here.

“That’s what’s wrong with a lot of the smaller operators that don’t get the bigger picture. They’re too stuck in running their store to update websites, get into Social Media and do all the things their competitors are doing right. Then they sit and cry about how bad business is,” says Christine Boulton, business adviser and creator of the Wedding Water Cooler.

 

What do you say? We promise not to censor you.

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

The Tuxedo Business Gets a Boost from Vera Wang and Tony Bowls; What a Situation

By Paul Pannone

2012 will be remembered as the year tuxedos were reinvented– not by the narrow-minded People of the Tux– but by women dress makers and a TV personality. After years of decline the sale and use of tuxedos are on an upswing, attracting foreign manufacturers and other interested investors that hear the buzz and look to capitalize on the resurgence.

Updated fit, new fabrics and stylish innovation get the credit for the upswing, led by manufacturers that use their tailored suit division intelligence and are able to quickly update silhouettes for a consumer no longer willing to wear his father’s tuxedo.

 

According to Google searches for the term “tuxedos” and related terms have been in decline since 2006. But current related tuxedo searches are up significantly at this time of year.

 

Internet searches hitting eWedNewz stories about tuxedos continue to grow in peak demand times. Searches for Vera Wang tuxedos are gathering attention, fueled by gown sales at David’s Bridal. Brides that buy Vera Wang dresses are directed to Men’s Wearhouse for the formal wear– a natural choice.

The popular Tony Bowls dress brand was used by Jim’s formal wear to create a Tony Bowls tuxedo that also sold well and is renting for prom. Again driven by dress sales, the emotional connection is a natural transfer from female to male escort.

The tuxedo talk of the season came from the Jersey Shore TV celebrity, the Situation, who promoted the line. Sources like TMZ, MTV, MSNBC and countless other news sources created a media event for the line. The orders and production for the number one new tuxedo for 2012, the Avalon, was cutoff, creating an even higher demand for the product.

So what do all these new tuxedo brands have in common? The same people who make Calvin Klein, Ralph Lauren, Joseph Abboud and other retail brands– FLOW Formalmake the garments for Vera Wang, Tony Bowls and the Situation.

Fashion sources say they’re not surprised at the growing buzz for tuxedo use. Expert, Jim Duhe, told eWedNewz;

“Interest in Vera Wang tuxedos is growing.  Why? Was there some type of divine intervention?  Did an arch angel come down from the sky and suggest that people should search the internet for Vera Wang tuxedos?  Did the compulsion to search for Vera Wang Tuxedos come to people in dream form?

Maybe you’ve noticed that Vera Wang tuxedo ads now are included in all major national bridal publications.  The campaign is  modest — spreads in each issue.   No retail locations are specified on the ad.  However, readers are directed to go to the Men’s Wearhouse web site.  Interesting.”

The rise in interest for tuxedos sparks interest from manufacturing and licensing organizations that want to get into the tuxedo business but admit they know very little of where to begin. Most don’t realize the cost involved and quickly back away when they find out what is involved.

 

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012