Vera Wang Chinese Try-on Policy Gets American Retailers Excited

By Paul Pannone

Vera Wang is making headlines again but this time not with a new dress design but for the honor to try a dress on. According to reports brides-to-be (in China) are being charged almost $500 dollars for an hour and a half appointment to try on Vera Wang merchandise. The fee gets deducted from the price of the dress– if they buy– otherwise the money is forfeited.

We wonder if stars like Angelina Jolie get charged to simply try on a dress before the actual sale. Or do they get paid for mock-up publicity?

 

Reports say the company is trying to keep from getting knocked off, protecting its brand and designs, much like American manufacturers who’re in a fight for survival against dress piracy in China. It’s unknown whether the Vera Wang company is serious about supporting the fight that was recently backed up by a New Jersey judge or if times are just tight for everyone, including the Vera Wang company.

So far the practice has not hit the United States but sources say Vera Wang is watching the PR and backlash. Last year Dolce & Gabbana drew criticism on Social Networks for disallowing picture-taking by Hong Kong natives but not tourists. The unclear guideline raised some issues that no company can afford these days with the rise and instant reprisal brought on by bad publicity over the internet.

In the United States, eWedNewz bridal sources say they’re thrilled at Vera Wang’s attempt to charge consumers to try on merchandise. Facebook responses included store owners who feel they’re losing sales to online dress companies who undercut their prices.

“Bridal Salon professionals spend a lot of time giving “professional advice” what is in style, how to accessories, negotiate, all these girls, not all, but the majority all they want to do is “showroom” your salon, take pictures, and won’t commit to buy, and they have already tried on 50+ gowns. You mean to tell me a gal can’t walk into a beautiful Bridal salon with boutique quality gowns( not you know who)and can’t find anything in their budget?? This is nonsense, because every store has gowns that should be falling off the racks in sales every day!!! Price…it is what it is…you can’t expect to buy St. Pucchi for $1000 including the veil,” said one retailer.

Similar thoughts given by all responding store retailers shows the deep frustration they feel towards the internet and how it’s affected their operation and ability to charge the needed mark-up to stay in business.

The discussion spilled over into the Wedding Water Cooler where we omitted statements from retailers in the group but focused on those given by sources not in the retail end of the business.

“A few bridal retailers in the US have instituted try-on fees in the past.  However, I’m not aware of any fee that’s as high as the fee that Vera is charging.  The retailer applies the try-on fee toward any merchandise purchased in the store.  It’s a practical and logical policy for name brand retailers.  I could be wrong about this but I believe that Kleinfeld’s has a try-on fee.   It prevents show rooming for internet sites.  In the long run, it may be the only thing that will prevent consumers from going to a retailer to try on a gown that they plan to purchase online.  I doubt that this policy will fly in small markets but I can see the benefit it provides:  it separates the lookers from the buyers; it allows the retailer to concentrate efforts on consumers who definitely will purchase at the store,” according to one WWC member.

Kleinfeld told eWedNewz they do not charge to try on their gowns but do take credit-card and other personal information to book the appointment. But, according to Kleinfeld in New York City, no money is charged to try on their merchandise and there is no obligation to buy from them. It clearly states on their website, picture taking is not allowed during the shopping appointment.

May I take pictures of the gowns while I try them on?

“We do not allow cameras in the fitting rooms while you are shopping. Once you have purchased a dress, you may take as many pictures as you’d like.”

 

eWedNewz will continue to follow this story. We ask for your thoughts and opinion.

 

 

 eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2013

Social Media Adding to Website Slide; both hurting print

By Paul Pannone

In the latest eWedNewz coverage involving the decline of traditional media, conventional websites are taking a beating.,  As far back as mid 2011 eWedNewz questioned the sustainability of static websites. Today webmasters who say they’ve made millions over the past decade admit they’re suddenly forced to reinvent themselves because of the Social Media explosion.

The growing use of Social Media displaces the need for websites; that displaced the need for printed products since the late 1990′s. Both Websites and Social Media have plummeted the sale of magazines.

 

In the beginning there was the Information Superhighway, A.K.A, the Worldwide Web. Blank stares soon became familiar with the term that gave way to the Internet and later just the Net. E-mail was some futuristic way to communicate and the letters AOL was the facilitator, connecting us with friends and thoughts.

Marketers jumped on banner ads charging exorbitant fees to tap into traffic with inflated numbers that were indisputable. Today banner ads are a joke, along with excessive hosting fees, domain name procurement and all the mystical SEO propositions put forth by Hucksters trying to make a buck. But can websites really totally fade away?

Not according to Wedding Water Cooler members who say they have a place, along with printed product experts.

Newest member of the Cooler, Dorinda Duclos told eWedNewz:

“Build it and they will come?  Yes…and no. Not without a lot of hard work and the right web master.  But that’s not to say that a well-built site won’t bring clients.  The social media takeover does not replace a traditional website.  It enhances it.  For example, you have a new product you want to promote, so you add it to your website.  Who sees it?  If you’re lucky enough to place highly in the search engines then maybe a few more people will.  Now take that same product back to Facebook, upload a picture, write a description & link it back to your website.  You now have a captive audience, through your fan base, (although with FB’s many changes, you may need to promote the product) who in turn will view your product, click the link and land back on your website.  This gives them the opportunity to view more products.  A traditional eCommerce website also allows the client to immediately purchase directly from there.

Pretty doesn’t mean better.  A flash site is a big no-no today because it won’t convert to mobile.  Unless you have code within your site that alerts when the user is accessing your site from a mobile device, they will not see your pages as you do when looking from your computer.  The code makes the necessary switch to a site that you’ve built specifically for mobile access.  Most websites today have this.  There are a few companies that offer the service and will actually build the mobile site for you.  You just have to add the html coding into your site.

The most important thing you can do is refresh your website’s main landing page as often as possible.  This helps keep content fresh and let’s the search engines know there’s something new to index. (Proper coding for Google, yahoo, etc is also needed for this)

Are websites dead? No.  Are they fading? Perhaps.  It really all depends on how much effort you, as the business owner, put into it.  You can’t expect a flower to grow without watering it.  Same thing holds true here.  Don’t think because you have a website that you have business.  You’ll wilt and eventually die…” says Duclos.

Duclos agrees with other business owners who realize launching a website is not the end of anything but only the beginning of the non-ending plight to promote the site. Experts tell eWedNewz the time and cost of standard websites has come crashing down, especially over the past six months. Webmasters who say they’ve made millions since the late 1990′s quietly admit the impact of Social Media has been destructive to their business. Add to the mix out-of-the-box products by Word Press and the “free” effect of available products (Facebook, Twitter, Linked In, etc) allowing business owners to post their own content and update their pages, it’s no wonder the thriving website business is suddenly in serious trouble.

On ongoing poll shows 57% of respondents look to the Internet for their  marketing needs (33% Social Media – 25% e-mail blasts). 16% say they use print. What do you say?

 

 

 

 eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2013

 

Wedding Website Update: Same Old Story, Just like the Wedding Business

By Paul Pannone

It’s the time of year when wedding websites run their Best of part of their program to hype themselves and try to convince wedding vendors how important it will be to renew their advertising for another year. Members of the Wedding Water Cooler are active this week punching holes in some of the most culpable websites saying they’re weary of listening to the same old song and dance. Many of the Coolies say they’re amazed at how many wedding vendors still support some of the tired old sites, despite repackaged pitches and revamped pages.

 

According to Wedding Water Cooler experts the lies are all the same but they’ve gotten better at lying.

 

 Wedding website whistle-blower, David Fuhrer updated his 2011 statement denouncing the practices of some websites which, in his view, remain relatively unchanged for the past five-years.

“What is remarkable is the lack of innovation upon websites such as The Knot, My Wedding, Wedding Wire. It is remarkable in the sense that a complete lack of value-incentive-propositions have been derived that increase the value of what they offer vendors. From a vendor foundation perspective all of the aforementioned haven’t evolved an iota, they remain circa 5 years ago. This is the fundamental rationale for why my perspective was, and has remained unchanged, that these sites possess a finite shelf-life. In essence their “roads” do not lead to “forks”, they lead to “brick walls”. The concentration has been wholly upon the user-experience & augmenting that experience. The means by which they have augmented is via pilfering off of each other.

The Knot was not a “review” website, it was an exposure website, they now offer user reviews. Wedding Wire was a review website, yet they now offer personalized websites. My Wedding was a personalized website offering that now has reviews. Instead of innovating, they are all supposedly enhancing, via broadening their offerings to the demographic with what can be found on the other websites. They then, pass along, these value-add’s, to prospective vendors in the form of “yes” we do that & even better & more intuitively than other competing sites,” he told the Water Cooler.

The website discussion stemmed from an ongoing story involving a 20/20 segment that got the wedding business to stand up and announce they’re not a bunch of crooks, opposing the way they were depicted in the segment. In an ongoing eWedNewz investigation about wedding marketers in the business, wedding websites and the fairy dust purported are part of the same story, giving vendors misinformation on how to treat consumers.

Chris Evans was interviewed for the 20/20 segment and mentioned his Boot Camp approach to selling. Evan’s business view of marriage is discussed in the Wedding water Cooler and singled out due to the attention it gathered in the 20/20 segment. Members of the group along with other wedding sources being interviewed for an upcoming eWedNewz story say the hard selling and lack of bedside, emotional approach is what’s giving the wedding business a bad name.

According to the Wedding water Cooler discussions wedding marketing and websites need to undergo a major overhaul to appeal to new wedding consumers who no longer turn to websites and older methods– replaced by Social media and referrals from their friends.

 

What do you think?

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2013

The Wedding Business in Worse Shape than First Thought

By Paul Pannone

An ongoing eWedNewz investigation shows the wedding business is in worse shape than anyone is willing to admit. Information and interviews across all channels of the business, including the part reported to be the most important; the dress business, shows severe damage caused by the collapse of the economy in 2008 and a slow recovery through 2011 and most of 2012.

Like brides, dresses come in all colors, not just white. Tuxedos have been replaced by black suits, navy and tan colors and everything you can imagine.

eWedNewz watches trends that includes the longer wait of men and women deciding to get married. The average age for first-time marriages continues to rise.

“The median age for a man’s first marriage was 28.2 years in 2010, up from 26.1 in 1990. The median age for a woman’s first marriage was 26.1 years in 2010, up from 23.9 in 1990,” according to www.infoplease.com  sourcing  U.S. Bureau of the Census information.

According to Census information the combined average age of men and women since 1960 has increased nearly 21% and has continues to rise world-wide. World trends show an even greater increase to resisting marriage. In the UK the average age for men and women hit 30 years this year citing Pew research while exploring probable causes.

Shedding tradition and traditional values continues to affect the number of marriages but also the formality of those weddings that do take place. Stylish, non-traditional weddings express the thoughts of couples who no longer want to be told what to wear, how to feel or plan their day.

Trends and shifts from normal wedding business finds those who plan to stay in the business are forced to change their operations to adapt to the shrinking numbers. Khalilah Olokunola of A Boxed Event and member of the Wedding Water Cooler shared her thoughts in the controversial forum:

“Many vendors I know have tripled up-not fine tuning their business to meet the demands of the changed times but instead (add) a whole new business . IT seems acceptable in some circles to be the baker, designer, director,planner and videographer- and no I’m not making that up there is a business that offers that.

Gone seems the days where you have to have skill and experience before you could add a title to your name. If you truly want to be successful you have to work hard, hustle hard and accept constructive criticism from more seasoned veterans. Geez I do all the time , I’m a coolie.

With brides and other “socialistas” decreasing their average budgets we all find ourselves redeveloping our business plans and offerings but still maintaining our integrity by offering the better bang for your buck,” says Khalilah.

Khalilah and others say the wedding business is flooded with services and products, challenging the pricing ability for vendors who seem to increase faster in numbers than the market shrinks. Plainly put there is no more need or room for another DJ, gown manufacturer, limousine company or any of the products to create traditional weddings. There are even too many catering facilities who’ve been forced to service a broader spectrum of events to keep rooms, kitchens and workers busy.

While investigating the story about the wedding dress business we’ve uncovered a growing number of outside sources infiltrating the business forcing manufacturers to take action. Recent advancements in the fight against pirates who’ve crippled the wedding dress business received no credit from skeptics who say the damage is too deep, too wide-spread and can never return to normal levels.

Across all channels eWedNewz watches and reports the changes taking place at places like David’s Bridal down to the smallest bridal stores who say they’re ready to throw in the towel. Decisions to sell majority equity stakes to investors like the one involving Jim’s Formal Wear become more and more common-place. Store closures servicing the wedding business are expected to increase, as manufacturers and suppliers tell eWedNewz they can no longer manage growing debt because accounts can’t meet their obligations.

Newsstand sale of bridal magazines continues to plummet giving some ammunition to pundits who say digital is killing print. But a closer look by eWedNewz shows grandfather wedding websites like TheKnot.com are also taking a pounding. eWedNewz exposé  stories about scandal, sexual debauchery and reported mismanagement of resources culminated in the death of morph digital/print companies like Get Married. So-far the rebirth of the company failed to come close in recapturing the glory the original launch created before the crash in 2008, now that the wedding business is older and wiser about the fairy-dust that surrounds them.

Planners of all sizes, including celebrity, say they’re looking to exit the business or expand into a broader range of services, no longer able to cut costs or charge enough fees to make it worth their while. Even “Wedding Market Gurus”, A.K.A, snake oil salespeople, are finding it difficult, if not impossible to charge speaking fees they did just a few short years ago. Most avoid our questions and keep pounding their drum of bullshit, acting as though everything is fine, while others see the changes and become alarmist, claiming to have the answer in some seminar or class.

Even hopefuls who thought the addition of Same-sex marriages to the wedding market, backed by the leader of the free world, say the events has so-far been just a small blip on the screen.

Olokunola again gave her view on how some of the troubles could be fixed:

“When the people who govern wedding magazine, trade shows and associations get real maybe– just maybe– it’ll get better. It’ll make it harder for scammers to scam and players to play and when we stick together as a whole. I believe a shift will take place towards an up direction and its there that the industry can begin again,” she said in the WWC forum.

Christine Boulton of Think Like A Bride told the Cooler how some companies are successful in the very tough business climate.

“There has been some serious restructuring in our business over the last four years. Business owners have changed their thinking; they are going after new markets and they have stepped away from an attitude of arrogance. In short, they stopped thinking of themselves as “artist” and begun to see themselves as businesses.”

Endless discussions clearly show the end of the wedding business as it once was. Is it time to stop discussing and look at what the information clearly tells us?

 

In an ongoing poll 32% of respondents so-far say the wedding business is rebounding but slowly.

What do you say?

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

Wedding Water Cooler Members Struggle to stay on Wedding Topics

By Paul Pannone

Because of the recent events in the country over the past several weeks wedding-related topics seemed to have taken a back seat to higher issues plaguing society. The hurricane disaster, the election and aftermath that has further divided the country has taken the attention away from trivial problems of the wedding business and caused many wedding industry people to get more involved in charitable activities and others to use the disaster as a reason to tailor marketing and try to scam dollars in any way they can.

 

New additions to the Wedding water Cooler includes retailers who’ve moved past their front door and been involved with all sides of the business.

Wedding Water Cooler members have tried to get back on topic sans the normal rhetoric and internal bashing. The addition of several new members could be a reason for the better behavior– but I doubt it. Members of the group did not escape devastation, citing down trees and power outages in their homes and businesses. Some opined on how this hurricane and devastation differed from Irene, hitting the metro New York and New Jersey area, getting more coverage.

Industry veteran and co-founder of the WWC, Christine Boulton, wrote a story involving wedding planners and the different roles they play. The story struck a nerve in the group and steered discussions back on track to the more trivial part of life– the wedding business.

Boulton’s story sketches out the roles played by planners in the following structure:

The Architect:

The architect designs everything from the structure to the appliance placement to the general layout of the landscaping. To translate this to wedding planning you start with nothing and design the whole package from location to lighting concept to the style of the invitations.

The General Contractor: 

The GC takes the plans and makes them happen. She hires the subs and creates the schedule. She keeps everything on track and budget. The translation: you take the brides concept and find the right vendors to make it happen. You make sure that they are all on the same page and working on schedule, that the flowers are delivered at the right moment and that the cake gets cut when the photographer is in place to catch the shot. You are the field general, implementing someone else’s plan.

The Stage Manager:

The stage manager comes in last, after the walls are in and the floors are in place. He makes sure that at the time of performance  timing is adhered to, that the props are all in place and that everyone hits their marks. This translates to weddings as someone who comes in after all the vendors have been hired and the major decisions made. You manage the actual day of, you work with what they are given to make the brides vision happen.

Boulton’s piece was hailed by planner members including  Khalilah Olokunola who said:

“Best damn article I’ve read in a long time regarding the roles of planning – I plan on sharing the heezy jeezy out of this! If more planners understood the different roles we would have less drama a better interpretation of what the industry and individuals have to offer. I’ve pondered throwing in the towel a few times this year, most recently last week because frankly it stinks and I’m so tired of the fly by night pop ups who do this just because they feel like it and not from because its fueled from a passion that started inside to create . I’m damn sure positive that I’m different , I look different, talk different and design different…heck I have different ideas of what fabulous is and isn’t - We all do ….The problem in it all is that you can’t market people who don’t really know who they are – I hope this article sets them free ….”

New addition to the group, Jacqui Wadsworth added:

“In our area, I’ve watched several women in the wedding business “become” wedding planners.  Their chosen fields weren’t apparently producing enough income, so they decided since they were photographers, or small bridal show event people, that they should “add-on” a related field in the form of wedding planner.  I’m keeping my eye open to see how this pans out for them.  I’m afraid that trend may be getting larger as everyone who loves the bridal market that can’t seem to make ends meet, looks for another way to do so.  I’ll keep you posted on my findings.
Meanwhile, I’m glad to hear what true wedding planners are doing.  Thanks!”
Wadsworth told eWedNewz she feels comfortable in the WWC since joining the group this month. So far Wadsworth has been the most-vocal of the new additions, taking her experience in retail, wholesale and combining the best of both worlds to start needed changes in the industry..
eWedNewz
All Rights Reserved
2012

Clean Up Time for the Internet and Online Commerce

By Paul Pannone

Follow-up discussions from a story involving the decommission of a popular wedding merchant website suggest the Internet is cleansing itself of bogus marketing and cheater schemes that have plagued its reputation from the start.  The creepiness of the internet via porn sites and even mainstream media sites like MySpace targeted victims and created an area where caution and common-sense became vital.

LA MARTINA encourages its customers to turn in fakesters on their website. The trend to clean up bogus websites and heavy discounters is expected to grow, as competition to sell goods and services intensifies.

 

Today the heightened awareness and more advanced internet shopper steers clear of bargains, bogus claims and simply demands the best, most recognized products at a fair price.

“Nothing beats good information that can be fact-checked and verified without much confusion,” according to Jim Duhe of Bridal Guide.

Duhe and other members of the growing Wedding Water Cooler group say there are definite changes on the horizon, now that every negative aspect of the internet and online commerce has been covered.

Paul Eilenberg of the group is researching online commerce and finds no one is immune to the perils.

“Even in the world of Polo players apparel (which is VERY high-end) fakes abound. Read this web site’s disclaimer. I thought it was interesting that this world-class brand would have to note this on their site:

The official LA MARTINA site www.lamartina.com is the only store on the internet that is authorized to sell LA MARTINA products. For this reason, all the items purchased through this site have the quality assurance and the authenticity granted to all official LA MARTINA items.

LA MARTINA does not guarantee the quality and authenticity of any items purchased through other sites on the internet.

If you find products being sold online that you consider counterfeited, please fill in the following form. Your cooperation will help us to keep a better control on the quality of products sold under our brand: La Martina.”

Seasoned veterans like Eilenberg take decades of experience and must now integrate and translate their knowledge online to help boost their traditional business in order to become visible to a new generation of consumers who’ve never known a world without the internet.

According to Eilenberg the internet has the ability to move the needle (and products) like no other measurable medium. Pretty paper ads served its time well and became the only place for affordable advertising to small businesses. But today the explosion of social media gives businesses who devote a portion of their advertising budget to online representation the opportunity to demolish their competitors.

According to Eilenberg the sale of purple suspenders suddenly became invigorated this past week because of a story involving popular prom colors for next season.

“Never underestimate the power of your press, even if it’s indirect. Five Star really did sell out purple which is crazy as it’s not a typically hot color for men’s suspenders.But sell out they did in both their regular elastic (opening price) as well as their grosgrain which is a much higher end product. Go figure.”

eWedNewz continues our investigation into online selling and how other manufactures are cracking down and even shutting down websites who offer major branded products for far-below MSRP prices. Discussions with some manufacturers say the brand is compromised, cheapened and violates licensing terms by which they distribute.

 

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

Samantha Slaps Sonny; Mentions Martha and Calls out Catalyst

By Paul Pannone

In yet another War & Peace type statement, Samantha Goldberg continued her relentless rant against Wedding Wire and their practices this week that have come under fire by the wedding industry. In an ongoing eWedNewz poll 44% of respondents so far feel the review website is horrible or flawed; 34% say Wedding Wire is great. But only 2% say they’re trying to improve.

 

Would Wedding Wire list and rate itself? If they did, what would their score be?

 

In a protracted response to Wedding Wire’s decision of  expunging a solid business in Oklahoma, Goldberg mercilessly recaps months of information involving the website, the name synonymous with the website and now, the new owners. In the prepared statement Goldberg speaks directly to Sonny Ganguly throughout her writing but calls out the new owners, the Catalyst Group, wondering if they are aware of what’s happening.

“Sonny, I know you must be reading this…Catalyst, they may not have, and I am sure they will question the many unethical things you have caused. Why they bought the 40% of Martha’s shares, I’ve no idea) There’s a great reason why Martha did. She is an amazing woman and certainly was a BIG percentage of why people stayed longer than they should. That despite her business decisions, she is right back up there being successful and changing as she needs to… She’s an “icon” of our world…and more. http://www.examiner.com/article/martha-stewart-sells-wedding-wire-for-5-million-dollars.”

Goldberg’s latest statement was released to the Wedding Water Cooler group. Members of the group recently stopped following the discussion, turning off alert emails. Others requested a more clear, concise type of response from Goldberg– but none will say her campaign is completely unwarranted.

In WWC discussions, David Fuhrer, suggested Wedding Wire add itself as a vendor to their listing service;

“Why doesn’t Wedding Wire list itself under the “Wedding Planning” category upon its website? It could then be reviewed in a likewise manner as its listing-population-base (I don’t refer to them as clients…we don’t know who paid, who paid more, who didn’t pay, who paid less, etc).

Heck they could start today & upload a WW listing in this category, and they could be be tested for how legit & “hands off they are” ’cause Samantha would be among the first reviewers. WW could perhaps learn some stuff from the listing-population-base that would better WW & the industries online efforts overall. Who loses w/ this suggestion? Win-win, no?” according to Fuhrer.

Other members of the group called Führer’s suggestion brilliant and see no reason Wedding Wires shouldn’t be listed and subjected to the same scrutiny they’ve created for other wedding industry organizations.

A copy of Samantha Goldberg’s statement was sent to Ganguly/Wedding Wire/Catalyst for comment. No response came by the time of this story’s release.

Download a copy of Goldberg’s release in its entirety.

 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

Owner of a Major Dress Manufacturing Company Addresses Allegations

 

By Paul Pannone

After a trip visiting factories in China, Steve Lang, owner of Mon Cheri, gave eWedNewz an update on the war against wedding websites and the growing loss of revenue to piracy and knock-off products. Since the March declaration of war Lang’s efforts has raised nearly $500,000 in hard cash and commitments from wedding-related organizations, including rivals and critics that are unified by the off-shore assault and lost revenue.

 

No good deed goes uncriticized. Steve Lang was forced to discuss unfounded allegations while building a system to help wedding gown retailers.

 

In an eWedNewz interview Lang admits the sale of prom gowns was challenged this season.

“Thank God our sales in wedding-related products is way up to cover what we missed in proms,” he told eWedNewz.

According to Lang’s estimate the US market lost over a half million sales to illegal transactions between American consumers and direct sales from China. The staggering number submitted by Lang contradicts an ongoing eWedNewz poll that shows 59% of respondents would be in favor of spending a little bit more for American-made products. Overall 84% would pay more or care about where products are made. Only 16% say it doesn’t matter where products are made or don’t care.

During the interview Lang says there is a new organization to help the wedding industry on the horizon. Details and finishing touches will be shared in the weeks ahead, along with other significant information.

eWedNewz asked why updates weren’t as frequent and non-existent towards the end of his trip. Lang said he was advised by his legal counsel not to tip-off critics sullied by angst or give them cause for any misinterpretation of the facts. Lang said he feels the perpetrators are closely watching everything that’s being said while a strategy that aligns with recent court victories get set to be deployed.

eWedNewz directly asked Lang whether his company is engaged in any direct sale of either knock-off or first quality Mon Cheri brand products.

In reply to direct questions involving any wrong-doing Lang fired back the following statement in the Wedding Water Cooler forum:

“No one here sells directly to consumers other than a stray personal for a family or friend. Each of those instances needs to be approved by me.

Sounds like someone is attempting to make trouble. Fair warning. If you know me, you know I will give the shirt off my back to you if you are in need of help.  By the same token, be advised that if you idly make allegations that are false, you do not want to be in the same universe with me.”

Discussions and hard-core questions with Lang nearly floored the man who eats, breathes and lives the wedding business. In every communication Lang categorically denies any action that would ever hurt any of his accounts. Lang pointed out how his worst enemies and critics embrace the ongoing efforts.

In addition, Lang’s company was a victim of piracy during his trip. Lang answered all questions and  consistently stayed on point during the interview. In an almost monotone voice he said:

“Even Wen Wu, whom I’ve sued, gave money to this cause, need I say more?” asks Lang.

Several times throughout the grilling Lang, known for his litigious tendencies, emphatically cautioned the sources of the unsubstantiated allegations.

Fellow esteemed members of the Wedding industry and Water Cooler privately contacted this newZ source, asking what was happening. Jim Duhe said the following in the forum:

“I seriously doubt that Steve is personally responsible for a pipeline of gowns direct to consumers.  It would be counterproductive for him to spend his own time and money to combat this problem if he was a source or one of the sources.I’d be shocked to discover that any of Steve Lang’s staff is a party to selling gowns directly to consumers, either.

I’m certain that Steve would discharge anyone immediately if this kind of activity were discovered.  The Mon Cheri staff is like family.  This kind of business would be the same as biting the hand that feeds you.  This isn’t to say that it “couldn’t” happen but it’s highly unlikely that it would happen.

Frankly, I don’t see what purpose is served by accusing Steve or his staff of this kind of activity.  It diverts attention away from the real problem of curtailing the culprits who are responsible for pirating images and selling gowns direct from factories.”

In a telephone conversation after Duhe’s written reply he told eWedNewz, “If Steve was behind it, it wouldn’t be such a mess that it is; it would be done right and never discovered– that’s why I know it’s false. Whatever he does, he does in exemplary fashion.”

eWedNewz Continues our coverage of this story and welcomes your thoughts and comments. Post them here or contact us at 516-312-0090 or Paul@ewednewz.com 

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

The President’s View on Same-sex Marriage Comes Out; what do Wedding Water Cooler members say?

By Paul Pannone

Facing a new low in approval rating earlier this year president Obama took a shot at jump starting his popularity, especially among liberal voters and supporters of same-sex marriages. Members of the Wedding Water Cooler were asked for their thoughts.

 

With political pressure mounting president Obama announces his opinion of same-sex marriages.

 

June Hoffman, an Indiana Officiant asked Weeding Water Cooler members for their thoughts:

“Hi Coolies~

I could hardly believe the radio today when they reported President Obama’s new stance on same – sex marriage. I had to read it myself. Legalizing marriage for same-sex couples could potentially have a huge impact on the wedding-world economy. As Officiants/DJs/MCs, we’ve performed commitment ceremonies and receptions in the past. I know that there would be a huge spike in weddings if this becomes legal. Same-sex couples have the same challenges and dreams as other couples. Times are changing indeed.

President Obama is the first president to endorse this type stand. It would sure do wonders for the bridal gown and tuxedo businesses as well as all other facets of the wedding community [?].”

Certain members of the Wedding Water Cooler– one’s with brains that work– gave their thoughts on the subject that varied from opposition to thanking God for the president’s action. Strong arguments on all fronts presented in a professional way gave similar conclusions favoring personal belief and individuality that resists government intervention.

Peter Gould told Coolies, “Personally I think the government should get out of sanctioning a religious ritual such a marriage, and abide by separation of church and state. I realize that for legal reasons, and there are many we need to recognize some sort of domestic unions and partnerships for all gay or straight, and those that want to have a marriage do so separately in their religion.”

Liz St. John lightened some of the heavy thoughts with some levity pointing out;

” Just an observation here – (though I believe that ANYONE that would like to be married, should be able to make that mistake).

We now have one candidate for president the believes that two people should be able to marry regardless of sex and one candidate that believes that one man should be able to marry multiple women.. Very interesting time to be alive.”

But back to business, Jim Duhe told the group;

“While I personally always have supported same sex marriage, I think that we’re still a long way from having no resistance on this topic.  Look at what just happened in North Carolina.  The battle is far from won.  Obama isn’t a shoe-in for the next election. None of that means that I’m not optimistic.  I want same sex marriages to be a reality because they are the right thing to do.  I hope that they have a positive impact on our industry but I won’t count the money until I see the cash in my hand.  I’m not sure how I’d react if I were personally impacted by this ruling.  I don’t believe that I’d jump up and marry tomorrow but that’s a hypothesis.  I’m not sure what I’d do. “

On the more opininated side Samantha Goldberg who is also from Chicago, told WWC members;

“Not an Obama fan….

1.How he walked into office with accepting the Nobel prize..

2. He is not as sincere as one thinks..I am a Chicago native and that is where he lived for a long time.

3. He thinks he was responsible for Osama? LMAO…I have swampland too..

No comment… Sorry if that sounds cold- He could careless about gay etc.. He is trying to regain what he had when he accepted the role as “President” he lost many believers..that is fact…He’s lost the trust …so what does someone of this caliber due when they begin to lose this? They go for areas that the public fights for…to save his ass…” said Goldberg. So much for “no comment”.

Analyst and creator of the Wedding Water Cooler, Christine Boulton had this to say;

“ I think that the right to marry should be a universal right but it must be fought on a state by state basis. Woe be to the politician that puts forth the reported constitutional amendment to define marriage as “between a man and a woman” that it is rumored certain conservative Senators and Representatives are proposing. They risk their reputation with all but the very conservative fundamentalist religious types. (btw, it isn’t just Christians, it is the fundamentalist side of ALL religions)

One thing that President Obama said that was I think the most salient thing he has ever said, it was his children that helped to shape his new view. When in the course of conversation with his daughters it became evident that they saw no difference in the parents of their peers that were same sex couples, if fact, didn’t find it odd in the least, that he changed his view.

That my friends is what will make the change. How we raise or children. If we raise the next generation to be open and accepting, gay marriage will become open and accepted. If on the other hand, we raise them to be bigots, then we will see more repression. Just the opinion of one person.”

Jacqueline Johnson commented;

“I guess I am the only one left to comment on this very important matter.  I applaud the President for having a new revelation on life and addressing the fact that if a couple desires to pledge their everlasting love and loyalty to each other – they should have the right to do so.  Whether it is to get votes or not (no one can tell what is in the heart of anyone) he changed his mind from 3 years ago and now trying to correct a wrong.

I make it a rule not to comment on religion on politics outside of the home - as you always manage to offend someone.  However, the President did inherit a country in serious financial trouble, and while some of his actions I do not agree with, he has done the best job he knows how to: to steer a massive ship fraught with some of the most mean-spirited people you can find in this century.  From a woman’s right to healthcare: you have old, narrow-minded men dictating how we should all live and care for our bodies.

And yes, whether we like it or not, he did give the okay to have Osama Bin Laden taken out.  If the mission had failed, he would be blamed mercilessly for putting the lives of Americans at risk – and how naïve he was to undertake such a mission.  It happened under his watch – so he either gets the blame or the credit.

As one who knows the sting of racism first hand, I believe in live and let live. Gay, lesbian, heterosexual, we should all live our lives in a dignified manner.”

Johnson wrote about the value of the growing GLBT market, challenging the narrow-minded thinkers of the wedding business to embrace, not shun them.

eWedNewz gives the last slot to Marcinho Savant who had this to say in part:

“Some people must be unaware that at certain times throughout history, same-gender unions were, in fact, blessed by clergy and clerics. Life did not begin with the narrow scope surrounding the years we may personally remember— or whatever we may have personally been trained to believe. How lucky one must be to believe that one’s opinion is absolute and correct— beyond questioning, investigation and unimpeachable. What a luxury it must be to be able to smugly discount the pains of other souls. Thank God SOMEONE questioned something or we’d still believe the world was FLAT.”

 What do you think? Do you agree with Obama’s decision to become  the first president to endorse same-sex marriages?

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012

 

Little Guys Pissed Over Big-Box Growth and Promotion

 

By Paul Pannone

An ongoing story involving the takeover of America splinters off into many paths, as confused Citizens of the United States– some of which are good people in business, not good business people– cry foul over many aspects of reality.   Average consumers and businesses feel they’re being squeezed out in favor of Big-box stores;  incensed by suppliers that run to them. The facts are sad, but they’re true.

According to About.com small business — firms with fewer than 500 employees — drives the U.S. economy by providing jobs for over half of the nation’s private workforce. According to a quote in their story;

“Small business drives the American economy,” said Dr. Chad Moutray, Chief Economist for the Office of Advocacy in a press release. “Main Street provides the jobs and spurs our economic growth. American entrepreneurs are creative and productive, and these numbers prove it.”

All true; small business owners are creative, tenacious, innovative, even cunning. But the reality is, most do not have the basic 101 skills to run successful businesses. You can re-read this statement as many times as you like; it won’t change the facts.

eWedNewz investigates why this is so and finds most business owners are driven by emotion, love for the product and see their business as an enemy to their lives, not a part of their life. Through the economic downturn that started in 2008, many have closed their business, replaced by people who lost their job and now see how difficult it is to be a business owner.

eWedNewz coverage of the China issues shows the disconnect of what Americans say and what they really do. A current poll shows only 16% of respondents so far say it doesn’t matter– or they don’t care– where products are produced, leaving 84% saying they do care and would support American products if they were competitively priced. If the poll was 100% reversed it would still show Americans feel the effect of offshore production and the slow but steady loss of American clout and prestige that affects us all. Yet Americans continue to buy products made elsewhere, spending less for the items but many are finding they’ve sacrificed a greater percentage of value, while putting American companies– and workers– out of business.

What you’ve so-far read is background to the real point of this story. In both their personal and business life, most Americans say one thing and do another. For this story we’ll focus on business decisions that should be universally standard across all channels but are not. With the affordability and ubiquitous availability of software, digital, social media, etc., most businesses stay stuck in neutral, letting competitors– especially Big-box operators– take market-share away from them, leading to eroded profit and exhausted patience.

Public exchange of some of the frustration is shown from eWedNewz stories that feature a divide between manufacturers and retailers that should be partnering together, instead of fighting each other. eWedNewz watches all sectors of business politely listening to laments and excuses of why small stores cannot compete. The conclusion; save for true market leading independent stores, the stay local campaign will face major challenges in the near future.

In the flower business websites like flowercomplaint.com urges the use of local shops. But support for convenience, brand recognition and decades of service, consumers still use the FTD network. If you watch and read what the complaint says, which way would you go? Do the names Home Depot and Wal-Mart mean anything? The very existence of Big-box stores named is contradictory to the high demand for service and quality American consumers ask for– but really comes down to the price they’re willing to pay.

In the dress business David’s Bridal is everyone’s enemy; anyone that makes or sells wedding dresses. Chat rooms and message boards are filled with horror stories– but so are complaints against little stores. Check the court docket; they’re filled with consumer cases– big and small.

According to sources the nation and the world are undergoing enormous change. But the desire for respect, value, expectation for and excellent experience never changes. However, human nature goes against the grain of business; big business. In the new order manufacturer say they’re tired of the overhead of dealing with smaller stores and look for one thing: the order.

Sources say Big-box stores can order goods fast and sell them even them faster. In a numbers game (that’s all it is) Big-box stores and manufacturers that can produce large sums of product somehow find each other. Big orders requires huge, up-front commitments on the part of the manufacturer. But as big business goes, from the moment they complete a deal they’re looking for someone cheaper, faster and able to deliver a better product; they only stick with each other because they cannot be replaced.

Several recent eWedNewz stories involving piracy and the success of larger operations struck a nerve, generating mostly private response. We’ll share one case for each story.

Christina DiBlase, owner of A. Bridal Co. & formal in New Jersey gave her opinion of what can be done to help the problems involving Chinese piracy. In response to the story, Jim Duhe responded:

“If manufacturers deleted all design images from their web sites and discontinued all advertising, their fate would be entirely in the hands of independent bridal retailers.  Unfortunately, most retailers aren’t nearly sophisticated enough to compete with big box stores or the brand name recognition of J.Crew, BHLDN, Nicole Miller, Bebe, and an ever growing number of national entities that are gaining prominence in the bridal marketplace.  The solution to Chinese  knock-offs may not be insurmountable but it certainly isn’t as simple as Christine DiBlase suspects.”

In repsonse to the comment, DiBlase fired back;

“Well, well I saw the article today and I guess good ol’ Jim Duhe thinks I’m a simpleton. I don’t see him offering a better solution. Wonder how’d he fix it. Apparently, we retailers are all so unsophisticated when it comes to advertising and branding that God only knows how we have survived so long in this economy. Our methods would most certainly be the demise of all those vendor who know so much more than us.”

Duhe’s turn:

“If retailers had a clue about marketing, they wouldn’t have paved the way for big box stores to walk off with more than 1/3 of all bridal gown sales in the country.  If bridal retailers had even a little marketing savvy, they would have developed multi-media ad campaigns that promote the benefits of shopping at an independent bridal salon.  Instead, the vast majority select not to advertise.  Brilliant.   I’m not saying that all bridal retailers are unsophisticated fools.  In fact, there are some brilliant retailers in the business.  However, as a group, they lack leadership and direction to address any problem that is industry-wide.  There has never been a successful national organization of  bridal retailers in America — EVER.

When big box stores began opening stores throughout the country, bridal retailers selected to move across town rather than maintain a location next to this new competitor.  The net result . . . most of the stores who moved away to escape the taint of David’s went out of business. Those who were “stuck” with locations near big box stores prospered.  Gee.  I wonder why?

When big box retailers began advertising in print, independent retailers decided that they wouldn’t advertise in any magazines that accepted big box store ads.  The net result . . . big box stores grew more quickly business of advertising exclusivity.  Brilliant move.

When the internet began to gain prominence, bridal retailers thought that their marketing problems were solved.  They believed that email blasts were the answer.  They believed that The Knot was the answer.  They believed that Wedding Wire was the answer.  The vast majority are willing to latch on to anything except logic to solve their problems.

Expecting the manufacturers to leave marketing is unrealistic and naive at best.  Don’t take my word for it.  Ask any manufacturer of any product with national distribution if this seems like a rational suggestion.  Do you think that Flow would select not to promote or advertise products on a web site?”

Duhe and other members of the Wedding Water Cooler mention FLOW and has consistently commented and applauded the formal wear manufacturer’s decision to break out of a mold (moldy) format that has not worked for decades. Onlookers that don’t understand basic business 101 passed on new programs and marketing ideas and found themselves  out of luck.

Not everyone sees it that way.

“Yes, by all means lets continue to send men to MW Tux…the store that treats the customer like cattle and charges them highway robbery prices to do it. There are however some brides who are wising up and seeking alternatives. Small local stores and chains can offer better prices, service and selection.

The new styles are falling short to deliver on all this grandiose marketing is claiming. I rented a Tony Bowls to a young man for prom this past week. I charged him the going rate “based” off all the hype and the slim fitted look. Just as MW tux would do for the Vera Wang items. The tux did not deliver one bit on its look and hype…it was so bad that the mother paid $75 more to have an old After Six La Strada shipped in! (only reason I did not give her a refund or cover the cost is the fact I advised her against renting the Tony Bowls.)

Marketing is good for any industry, but keep in mind it must be kept as honest as possible…fitted or slim fit rentals are a pipe dream. That is why they are rentals, if you want fitted try and convince your customer to buy the tuxedo and have it tailored as needed. Don’t over promise then under-deliver,” according to Stephen D. Schaffer, proprietor.

 

The owner of  tux2u.com charged $75 more to have an old After Six La Strada shipped in; another verification why tuxedo stores are losing credibility, renting old garments made over a decade ago. Please visit www.tux2u.com they have a good choice of cigars; and their watches aren’t bad either.

We won’t waste your time with more of Mr. Schaffer’s assertions; laughably about censorship. If you’re interested, you can see it here.

“That’s what’s wrong with a lot of the smaller operators that don’t get the bigger picture. They’re too stuck in running their store to update websites, get into Social Media and do all the things their competitors are doing right. Then they sit and cry about how bad business is,” says Christine Boulton, business adviser and creator of the Wedding Water Cooler.

 

What do you say? We promise not to censor you.

eWedNewz

All Rights Reserved

2012